This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.

MeetingsTue, Jan 24, 2017

Special Council

AgendaMinutes

Summary

  • Accepted the CRD's new Regional Growth Strategy and recommended its adoption to the CRD Board (Bylaw 4017).
  • Expressed interest in exploring commuter train service on the E&N corridor between Langford and Victoria (inter‑municipal study).
  • Directed staff to prepare ALR exclusion application and notice for 940 and 960 Latoria Road (school site).
  • Approved CRD Water pump station/reservoir at 2131 Bear Mountain Pkwy; land counted toward CD12 open space.

Decisions

What council voted on, in agenda order.

3 decisions
  • Accepted the proposed Regional Growth Strategy and recommended its adoption to the CRD Board.

    4.a · CRD - 2016 Regional Growth Strategy Bylaw 4017 - for Municipal Acceptance - Staff Report (Planning)

    Moved by Blackwell, seconded by Sifert
  • Allowed CRD Water use of 2131 Bear Mountain Pkwy; counted toward CD12 open space.

    4.c · Request to Allow a CRD Water Pump Station and Reservoir on Lands Designated as Open Space in the South Skirt Mountain Master Plan - Staff Report (Planning)

    Moved by Szpak, seconded by Sifert
  • Expressed interest in exploring commuter rail service on the E&N corridor between Langford and Victoria.

    4.d · Commuter Rail - Verbal Update (Mayor Young)

    Moved by Szpak, seconded by Sahlstrom

Agenda

8 items · select one for details, debate and documents

Summary

The Chair called the meeting to order at 10:00 am.

Summary

Council moved to approve the agenda as presented.

Motions (1)

PassedMoved by Councillor M. Sahlstrom

That Council Approve the Agenda as presented.

Summary

There was no public participation.

4
Section 4

Summary

Council accepted the proposed new Regional Growth Strategy (Bylaw No. 4017) and recommended its adoption to the CRD Board.

Motions (1)

PassedMoved by Councillor D. Blackwell

That Council accept the proposed new Regional Growth Strategy as contained in Bylaw No. 4017 and recommend its adoption to the CRD Board.

Documents (4)

Planning staff report seeking Council direction regarding municipal acceptance (or rejection) of the CRD's proposed Regional Growth Strategy Bylaw No. 4017, summarizing changes since the May 2016 review and identifying mapping and policy changes of concern.

Report date: January 24, 2017Subject: CRD Regional Growth Strategy (Bylaw No. 4017) – request for municipal acceptanceNoted mapping change: large parcel in SW Langford shown as Renewable Resource Lands due to Private Managed Forest Land registrationNotes new RGS wording re: review of new water service bylaws and municipal boundary adjustment detail (Metchosin/Langford)Legal: acceptance required under the Local Government Act; dispute resolution if not unanimous
Staff Report to Council — Regional Growth Strategy – Capital Regional District

Text not available.

Page 3–5
Background

Text not available.

Page 3–5
Commentary

Text not available.

Page 3–5
Financial Implications

Text not available.

Page 3–5
Legal Implications

Text not available.

Page 3–5
Options

Text not available.

Page 3–5
Respectfully Submitted

Text not available.

Page 3–5
View full document

Single-page graphic/map illustrating proposed changes to the CRD Regional Growth Strategy (Alternative 1) referenced in the staff report attachment.

Graphic/map titled 'Regional Growth Strategy Proposed changes to reflect Alternative 1 (November 9, 2016)'Associated with staff report on municipal acceptance of CRD Bylaw No. 4017Page: 6 of 84
Regional Growth Strategy — Proposed changes to reflect Alternative 1 (November 9, 2016)

Text not available.

Page 6
View full document

Formal CRD bylaw (No. 4017) to adopt the updated Regional Growth Strategy; includes reading dates and references Schedule A (the RGS document).

Bylaw number: 4017Readings noted: First and Second readings (dates referenced Sept 13, 2016 and Oct 12, 2016 entries)States Schedule A is designated as the 'Regional Growth Strategy for the Capital Regional District'Requires adoption date (adoption lines present)
CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT

Text not available.

Page 7–8
BYLAW NO. 4017

Text not available.

Page 7–8
A BYLAW TO ADOPT A REGIONAL GROWTH STRATEGY FOR THE CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT

Text not available.

Page 7–8
View full document

The full Capital Regional District Regional Growth Strategy (Schedule A), containing vision, objectives, policies, maps, targets and implementation measures to guide regional growth to 2038.

Contains Vision, Objectives, Maps, Policies and Implementation Measures for the CRD to 2038Targets include: accommodate minimum 95% of new dwelling units within Growth Policy Area; reduce community GHG emissions 33% (from 2007) by 2020 and 61% by 2038Includes Map 3 Growth Management Concept Plan, Map 4 Renewable Resource Lands Detail, and Map 5 Municipal Boundary Adjustment Detail (reference to ~380 acres in Metchosin/Langford area)Addresses policies on water service extensions, infrastructure, housing affordability, transportation, food/agriculture and ecosystem protection
Regional Growth Strategy (Schedule "A" to Bylaw No. 4017)

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 9

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 10

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 11

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 12

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 13

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 14

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 15

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 16

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 17

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 18

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 19

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 20

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 21

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 22

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 23

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 24

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 25

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 26

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 27

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 28

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 29

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 30

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 31

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 32

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 33

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 34

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 35

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 36

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 37

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 38

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 39

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 40

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 41

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 42

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 43

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 44

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 45

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 46

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 47

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 48

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 49

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 50

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 51

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 52

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 53

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 54

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 55

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 56

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 57

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 58

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 59

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 60

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 61

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 62

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 63

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 64

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 65

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 66

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 67

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 68

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 69

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 70

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 71

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 72

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 73

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 74

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 75

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 76

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 77

Text not available.

Page 9–78
Page 78

Text not available.

Page 9–78
View full document
Regional Growth StrategyCRDBylaw 4017

Summary

Council directed staff to work with SD62 and property owners to prepare a new ALR exclusion application for 940 and 960 Latoria Road, request ALC reconsideration, and prepare a staff report once notifications and submission are complete.

Location

940 Latoria Road

960 Latoria Road

Motions (1)

Outcome not recordedMoved by Councillor D. Blackwell

That Council: 1. Direct staff to work in conjunction with SD62 and the property owners of 940 and 960 Latoria Rd to prepare a new ALR Exclusion application with regards to those properties, and proceed with the required public notification; and 2. Direct staff to request that the ALC consider amending their conditional approval originally issued in June 2016 for the Block ALR Exclusion application (ALR15-0002) to include 940 and 960 Latoria Rd among those properties identified as "approved for exclusion" as part of the reconsideration currently being undertaken by the ALC; and 3. Direct staff to prepare a staff report to Council with regards to this application once required notification measures are complete and the application is submitted to the City.

Documents (1)

Planning staff report regarding an application to exclude properties at 940 and 960 Latoria Road from the Agricultural Land Reserve in relation to a School District No. 62 school site.

Addresses: 940 and 960 Latoria RoadSubject: Application to exclude lands from the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) — School District No. 62Listed on agenda as staff report (Planning), page reference 79Relevant to municipal comment/response to provincial ALR exclusion process
Staff Report — Application to Exclude 940 and 960 Latoria Road from the Agricultural Land Reserve (SD No. 62 School Site)

Text not available.

Page 79–81
Background

Text not available.

Page 79–81
Commentary

Text not available.

Page 79–81
Financial Implications

Text not available.

Page 79–81
Legal Implications

Text not available.

Page 79–81
Options

Text not available.

Page 79–81
Respectfully Submitted

Text not available.

Page 79–81
View full document
ALRLatoria RoadSD62

Summary

Council agreed to make available LOT 1 SECTION 114 ESQUIMALT DISTRICT PLAN VIP87674 PID 028-155-742 (2131 Bear Mountain Parkway) for a CRD pump station and reservoir and to count those lands toward the CD12 zone open space requirement.

Location

LOT 1 SECTION 114 ESQUIMALT DISTRICT PLAN VIP87674 PID 028-155-742 (2131 Bear Mountain Parkway)

Motions (1)

PassedMoved by Councillor L. Szpak

That Council: 1. Agree to make available to CRD Water that portion of the property legally described as LOT 1 SECTION 114 ESQUIMALT DISTRICT PLAN VIP87674 PID 028-155-742 (2131 Bear Mountain Parkway) required to install a water pump station and reservoir; and 2. Agree that those lands required by CRD Water for the pump station and reservoir shall be counted towards the requirement to provide 40% of the lands within the CD12 Zone as open space.

Documents (1)

Planning staff report considering a request to permit placement of a CRD water pump station and reservoir on lands designated as Open Space under the South Skirt Mountain Master Plan (related to Bear Mountain Parkway).

Subject: CRD request to place water pump station and reservoir on Open Space lands in South Skirt Mountain Master PlanLocation reference: Bear Mountain Parkway (as noted in meeting notice)Listed on agenda as staff report (Planning), page reference 82Decision requested: whether to allow CRD infrastructure on land designated Open Space
Staff Report to Council

Text not available.

Page 82–84
Background

Text not available.

Page 82–84
Commentary

Text not available.

Page 82–84
Financial Implications

Text not available.

Page 82–84
Legal Implications

Text not available.

Page 82–84
Options

Text not available.

Page 82–84
Respectfully Submitted

Text not available.

Page 82–84
View full document
CRD WaterPump StationBear Mountain ParkwayOpen SpaceCD12

Summary

Council expressed interest in further exploring the viability of commuter rail service on the E&N corridor between Langford and Victoria as an inter-municipal or regional transit commission model.

Motions (1)

PassedMoved by Councillor L. Szpak

That Council express its interest in further exploring the viability of commuter train service on the E&N corridor between Langford and Victoria as an inter-municipal service, or under Victoria Regional Transit Commission as a local commuter train commission in partnership with provincial, federal, local and First Nation governments for operational and capital expenditures.

Commuter RailE&N corridorTransit

Summary

The Chair adjourned the meeting at 10:20 am.

Motions (1)

Outcome not recordedMover not recorded

Adjourn the meeting.