This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.

DocumentsAppendixOct 10, 2023Pages 42–59

Arborist Report — 3405 Happy Valley Road (Capital Tree Service Inc.)

Arborist assessment (July 21, 2023; revised July 28, 2023) documenting a tree inventory and condition assessment for 3405 Happy Valley Road, identifying high-risk trees, recommended removals and tree protection and replacement measures for the proposed development.

Key facts

  • Total trees assessed: 109 (all within Habitat and Biodiversity Development Permit Area)
  • Recommended removals: majority of trees (report identifies ~95 proposed for removal due to health/location)
  • Noted issues: suspected Phellinus weirii (laminated root rot) in many firs; many trees shallowly rooted on bedrock and in decline
  • Replacement/tree mitigation guidance: replacement tree requirements by size class and detailed tree protection plan (TPF fencing, project arborist oversight, mitigation for blasting, excavation protocols)
  • Report date and acknowledgement: July 28, 2023; signed/acknowledged by client (TEKloch Homes)

Arborist Report — 3405 Happy Valley Road, Langford, BC V9C 2X9

July 21, 2023
Revised July 28, 2023

Prepared for: TEKloch Homes
Prepared by: Capital Tree Service Inc.
310-777 Royal Oak Dr, PO Box 53512, Victoria BC, V8X 5K2
Ph: 250-217-8370, email: joelcreese@capitaltreeservice.ca
capitaltreeservice.ca
GST # 861289783RT0001
WSBC Account #713323
Liability and Professional E and O, HSM Insurance - $5 Million

Page 42–59

Summary/Scope of Work

Capital Tree Service Inc. (CTS) was contacted by John Sercombe of TEKloch Homes (Client), a local development firm, regarding a strata development at 3405 Happy Valley Road (the Site) in the city of Langford. The Client has requested that CTS provide an Arborist Report regarding the trees on the site. A tree inventory is included as Appendix ‘A’. Photographs and a Site Plan are included as Appendix ‘B’ of this report.

Page 42–59

Methodology

The Site was entered on March 7, 2023 by CTS for the purpose of conducting tree assessments and collecting inventory. Joel Creese and Ray Praud, a consulting arborists and representatives of CTS, provided the BVTA for the site. The weather that day was 8°C and Overcast with a 10km/h South Breeze.

The Site was assessed from grade. No form of diagnostic tools or invasive techniques were used during the assessment, including excavation or assessment of roots below. Diameters were measured using a Richter Diameter Tape. Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) was measured approximately 1.4m above grade. Measurements and observations were recorded with the intent to provide a static representation of the area. A tree inventory is included as Appendix ‘A’ of this report. Photographs and a Site Plan are included as Appendix ‘B’ of this report.

During the assessment, one hundred and nine (109) trees of concern were observed – all (109) of which are protected as they are located within a Habitat and Biodiversity Development Permit Area. Trees referenced in Appendix ‘A’ and located on the site have been tagged. Tags are located approximately 1.5-2m above grade on tree stems and were visible at the time of assessment.

Protected Root Zone calculations are based on the ISA recommended one foot for each one inch of trunk diameter (0.3m for each 2.5 cm). Matheny and Clark’s ‘Trees and Development’ was used to assess relative tolerance to Development Impacts.

Page 42–59

Discussion

During the assessment, a partially treed rocky parcel surrounded by new construction on two sides and Happy Valley Rd on the fourth side. The site is located within a Habitat and Biodiversity Development Permit Area (DPA). The trees appear to be second and third growth forest. Tree species on site primarily consists of Douglas fir, Arbutus, Shore pine, with several other tree species intermixed. The growth and structure of the trees of concern are indicative of those that have grown in a stand with poor taper, poor live crown ratios, and stem deflections, often due to phototrophic growth in early growing years.

One hundred and nine (109) trees were inventoried due to possible impacts, all of which are protected as they are located within a Habitat and Development DPA. Under the current proposal, ninety-five (95) trees, all of which are protected, are proposed for removal. A further seven (7) trees, all (7) of which are protected, are located on a proposed park dedication, however, CTS recommends that some or all these trees be removed or modified. Finally, seven (7) trees, all (7) of which are protected, are proposed for retention and protection as they are entirely or partially located lots not proposed for development.

Expected Tree Impacts

The trees within the footprint of the Vision Way extension, Strata road, Strata building lots, and Lots C-D are proposed for removal.

Location Number (DPA Protected)
Vision Way Extension 25
Strata Road 8
Strata Building Lots 38
Lot C 7
Lot D 14
Lot E 3
Park 7
Retain 7

The trees located on the proposed park dedication (tagged 451-458 and 738) are all Douglas firs located on the eastern side of the lot. If the proposed development is approved and the houses built, the trees of concern would pose a high risk over the next two years. The trees were observed to be shallowly rooted on bedrock with limited available soil volume for anchoring. Laminated root rot, Phellinus weirii, is suspected to be present in many of these firs. The development activities that have occurred surround the site have likely changed the hydrology, a factor that will be further affected by the planned development on the site. Winds are often funneled through the Happy Valley. Once the site has been cleared for the planned development, the trees of concern will be almost fully exposed, except by southwesterly winds, thus increasing the likelihood of failure to probable. Due to the proximity of existing and proposed houses within one tree length on three sides the likelihood of impact is considered to be high. Therefore, with high value targets, the risk is considered to be high. These trees are expected to continue to decline. If the trees of concern are not removed (or the associated risks otherwise mitigated), it is possible that these trees could become an extreme risk the relatively near future (timeline based on rate of decline) with few options for safe removal. Safe removal or mitigation of these trees will be limited due a more confined space due to the proposed houses, limited accessibility due to the proposed houses and difficult terrain and decreased structural stability as the decline of the trees is expected to continue. If the proposed development is approved and this area becomes park land, wildlife trees would be a viable option rather than complete removal. If these trees were to be reduced and left standing as wildlife trees, they should be topped at a height such that there are no significant targets within one (1) tree length.

Replacement trees will be required for any tree removed or modified within the parkland. Replacement tree ratios are determined by tree size as specified in Section 14.2.6.3. of the City of Langford Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw (No. 1000). A total twenty-one (21) replacements trees will be required, please see Table 2 for a replacement tree breakdown.

Replacement Trees (Table 2)

Replacement tree table showing the number of removals within each size category, the required number of replacement trees for each category and the total number of replacement trees by category and overall.

Size Category (DBH) Number of Removals Replacement Trees required for each removal Total Trees
15-30cm 1 2 2
30-45cm 1 3 3
45-90cm 4 4 16
Total 6 - 21

During the subdivision and building phases of the proposed development, care should be taken to mitigate the trees proposed for retention and any park trees that are retained. This should include tree protection fencing to protect as much of the protected root zone of each retained tree as possible, the use of low nitrogen and low velocity explosives (in conjunction with tree armoring) if blasting is required, and arborist supervision while working within the protected root zone of any protected tree.

Page 42–59

Common and Latin Names

  • Grand fir – Abies grandis
  • Red alder – Alnus rubra
  • Arbutus – Arbutus menziesii
  • Shore pine – Pinus contorta var. contorta
  • Cherry – Prunus subg. Prunus
  • Douglas fir – Pseudotsuga menziesii
  • Garry oak – Quercus garryana
  • Pacific yew – Taxus brevifolia
Page 42–59

Tree Condition Ratings Summary

Health Condition:

  • Poor - significant signs of visible stress and/or decline that threaten the long-term survival of the specimen.
  • Fair - signs of stress.
  • Good - no visible signs of significant stress and/or only minor aesthetic issues.

Structural Condition:

  • Poor - Structural defects that have been in place for a long period of time to the point that mitigation measures are limited.
  • Fair - Structural concerns that are possible to mitigate through pruning.
  • Good - No visible or only minor structural flaws that require no to little pruning.

Species Relative Tolerance to Construction Impacts:

  • Fir – Generally Moderate-good – “Tolerant of root loss.”
  • Red alder – Poor-moderate – “Retain only in groups or as individuals with strong taper and structure. Relatively short lived. Intolerant to root injury.”
  • Arbutus – Poor – “Intolerant of site disturbance.”
  • Pine – Generally Moderate-Good
  • Cherry – Moderate – “Intolerant of mechanical injury (poor compartmentalization).”
  • Douglas Fir – Poor-good – “Tolerant of fill soil if limited to one-quarter of root zone. However, may decline slowly following addition of fill. Tolerant of root pruning. Intolerant of poor drainage.”

(Reference: Nelda P. Matheny and James R. Clark, Trees and Development: A Technical Guide to Preservation of Trees during Land Development, 1998.)

Page 42–59

Tree Protection Plan

  • Utilize Tree Protection Fencing (TPF) to restrict access to Tree Protection Zones. Provide signage on fencing which states: Tree Protection Area – No Admittance. Signage must be in a visible location attached to the fence. Signage must be attached to the outside of each Tree Protection Fencing area.
  • Contact CTS to mark locations for the Tree Protection Fencing. All Tree Protection Fencing must be installed in the locations indicated by CTS. CTS must provide inspection and verification of the fencing detail for City approval.
  • Each Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) must be vacated of all construction materials and/or equipment. At no time may the fencing be removed or modified unless the Project Arborist is contacted and approval given. In such cases the Project Arborist must assist fence removal and assess combined impacts which are required for construction completion. Capital Tree Service 250-217-8370 – Three business days notice required.

Landing/Storage Area
All construction materials will be stored outside of the protected root zone of any retained tree. These locations are indicated on the Site Plan.

Access
A single point of access shall be utilized. Contractors and workers shall be made aware of the Tree Protection Zones and Measures in place. Access will be from the front of the property from Smythe St. Tree Protection Zones and areas of the Site not under construction or within the Zone of Impact will be strictly off limits. It is the responsibility of the Client to schedule a pre-job meeting with the Project Arborist to discuss Tree Protection Plans, Zones, and requirements.
Five business days notice required. Project Arborist. 250-217-8370

Root Assessment and Observation
The Project Arborist must be on site for observation and assessment when working within the Protected Root Zone of any Protected Trees. This included any retained park tree and trees partially or entirely on a lot that is not proposed for development.

Tree Pruning
Tree pruning required for access and egress, tree health and safety shall be performed by an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Certified Arborist without the use of climbing spurs. All tree pruning shall be performed in accordance with ANSI A-300 Standards for Tree Care Operations.

Blasting

The use of blasting for removal of rock may cause serious damage or death to nearby trees if not managed appropriately. CTS recommends the use of low nitrogen and low velocity explosives. Furthermore, we recommend the use of explosives to strategically fracture the rock before using an excavator to breakup (using a hoe ram) and remove the rock. It is critical that ¾” plywood is used to protect (armour) retained trees and that heavy matting is used to dampen shockwaves. A removal plan for the rock will be developed with the blasting contractor and the Project Arborist. It is recommended that this plan is created prior to the blasting contractor providing a cost estimate.

Tree Protection Plan Summary

i. Provide a detailed sign specifying that tree protection measures are in place and will be followed during the project. Fines will be posted for malicious acts and can be placed on individuals who disregard the tree protection plan and its guidelines. Signs will be placed at each entrance of the project detailing what is expected when working in potentially high impact tree protection zones.
ii. Provide tree protection fencing for all trees identified with protection requirement in this report. This fencing shall be four (4ft) feet in height and made of orange plastic. If required, header and footer boards will be used to secure the protective fencing.
iii. Tree protection and root protection signs will be placed on the fencing. No entry will be allowed, unless specified by the Project Arborist and in their presence while on site.
iv. Restrict vehicle traffic to designated access routes and travel lanes to avoid soil compaction and vegetation disturbances.
v. Make all necessary precautions to prevent the storage of material, equipment, stockpiling of aggregate or excavated soils within tree protection areas. No dumping of fuels, oils or washing of concrete fluids will be allowed in tree protection zones.
vi. Provide an onsite arborist when a risk of root damage, root cutting, or limb removal is required within the tree protection zone.
vii. Avoid alterations to existing hydrological patterns to minimize vegetation impacts to the site.
viii. The use of a Project Arborist is required to provide layout of tree protection zones. The Project Arborist(s) will provide pre-construction information to all parties involved with the project. The Project Arborist must be notified 72hrs prior to construction activities in sensitive areas. The Project Arborist should be used to provide root and branch pruning when diameters are greater than 6cm.
ix. At no time will tree protection zones be removed from the project unless approved by the Project Arborist.

Page 42–59

Excavation Process Plan

  1. Provide and schedule Project Arborist to assess site prior to construction.
  2. Inventory and identify trees and hazards which could complicate excavation process.
  3. Utilize hand tools and cutting equipment when large tree roots are anticipated.
  4. When possible, utilize small, rubberized track excavation equipment which will reduce soil compaction.
  5. Excavator operator must be well informed about dig site and goal to complete project.
  6. Use shallow excavation sweeps across the site to establish a depth which roots can be easily identified. (3cm to 5cm in depth of soil for each sweep across the soil face)
  7. Roots greater than 6cm in diameter shall be preserved and inspected by the Project Arborist. The project arborist will determine if roots should be pruned or cut.
  8. All roots greater than 6cm in diameter should be identified and documented for project records.
  9. Photos are highly recommended for documentation purposes.

Assessment of the site may expose further tree issues or conditions. If this occurs the project arborist will contact City Staff for further recommendations.

Page 42–59

Role of the Project Arborist

As well as creating the Tree Preservation Plan, the Project Arborist must be on site to supervise work within or immediately adjacent to the tree protection areas identified on the attached tree plan. This will include sidewalk, driveway and any improvements proposed for the municipal boulevard.

The Project Arborist will be present to supervise landscaping operations and activity within the tree protection areas.

At completion of the project, the Project Arborist will confirm that any tree protection or remediation related deficiencies have been addressed by the owner and building contractor. Once all deficiencies (if any) have been remedied, the Project Arborist shall prepare a letter to the City of Langford confirming completion of the project.

The following is a summary of key roles of the Project Arborist.

  • Participation in a site meeting prior to the commencement of works adjacent to Tree Protection Zones to discuss the preservation plan and tree protection measures in place. It is the responsibility of the Client to schedule a pre-work site meeting. Five days Notice Required. CTS 250-217-8370
  • The meeting will review the Tree Protection Plan, Tree Protection Zones and the specific measures required to protect the trees during the site preparation, construction and landscape phases of construction.
  • The Project Arborist will inspect the Tree Protection Fencing and any other tree protection measures prior to a tree permit being issued by the City and prior to work commencing on site.
  • The Project Arborist will be on site during the following work within or immediately adjacent to the Tree Protection Areas as indicated on the attached Site Plan:
    • demolition
    • grading
    • excavation
    • rock removal or blasting
    • trenching for underground services and utilities
    • preparation of grade for the proposed driveways and parking areas
    • site inspections to insure adherence to Tree Protection Measures

Although this site has been assessed trees in the landscape are dynamic and changes could occur. This report is a static representation of the site during our assessment.

Keegan Durovich 07/28/2023
Capital Tree Service Inc.
ISA Certified Arborist TRAQ PN-9272A
B.A.Sc.

Page 42–59

Conditions of Assessment Agreement

This Conditions of Assessment Agreement is made pursuant to and as a provision of CTS, providing tree assessment services as agreed to between the parties, the terms and substance of which are incorporated in and made a part of this Agreement (collectively the “Services”).

Trees are living organisms that are subject to stress and conditions and which inherently impose some degree or level of risk. Unless a tree is removed, the risk cannot be eliminated entirely. Tree conditions may also change over time even if there is no external evidence or manifestation. In that CTS provides the Services at a point in time utilizing applicable standard industry practices, any conclusions and recommendations provided are relevant only to the facts and conditions at the time the Services are performed. Given that CTS cannot predict or otherwise determine subsequent developments, CTS will not be liable for any such developments, acts, or conditions that occur including, but not limited to, decay, deterioration, or damage from any cause, insect infestation, acts of god or nature or otherwise. Unless otherwise stated in writing, assessments are performed visually from the ground on the above-ground portions of the tree(s). However, the outward appearance of trees may conceal defects. Therefore, to the extent permitted by law, CTS does not make and expressly disclaims any warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied, with respect to completeness or accuracy of the information contained in the reports or findings resulting from the Services beyond that expressly contracted for by CTS in writing, including, but not limited to, performing diagnosis or identifying hazards or conditions not within the scope of the Services or not readily discoverable using the methods applied pursuant to applicable standard industry practices. Further, CTS’ liability for any claim, damage or loss caused by or related to the Services shall be limited to the work expressly contracted for.

In performing the Services, CTS may have reviewed publicly available or other third- party records or conducted interviews and has assumed the genuineness of such documents and statements. CTS disclaims any liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies resulting from or contained in any information obtained from any third- party or publicly available source.

Except as agreed to between the parties prior to the Services being performed, the reports and recommendations resulting from the Services may not be used by any other party or for any other purpose. The undersigned also agrees, to the extent permitted by law, to protect, indemnify, defend and hold CTS harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, rights and causes of action of every kind and nature, including actions for contribution or indemnity, that may hereafter at any time be asserted against CTS or another party, including, but not limited to, bodily injury or death or property damage arising in any manner from or in any way related to any disclaimers or limitations in this Agreement.

By accepting or using the Services, the customer will be deemed to have agreed to the terms of this Agreement, even if it is not signed.

Acknowledged by:

Name of Customer: John Sercombe of TEKloch Homes, 3405 Happy Valley Road, Langford, BC V9C 2X9

Authorized Signature: _______________________________________________

Date: 2023-07-28

Page 42–59

Appendix ‘A’ — Tree Inventory

Table 1. Tree Inventory for 3405 Happy Valley Rd. Diameter at breast height (DBH) is measured in centimeters. Protected root zones (PRZ) are calculated using a 0.12 multiplier and represent the protected radius area around the tree in meters. Site notes included: Trees are rooted on bedrock. Limited soil. Phellinus weirii likely present in whole area. Changes to hydrology due to surrounding development. Site will be fully exposed when cleared. Previously sheltered area- all new exposure to the East and North. West to be exposed.

Conditions: 8°C, Overcast, 10km/h South light breeze. Date: March 7, 2023

Page 42–59
Tag # Species DBH (cm) PRZ (m) Health/Structure Protected Action Comments
451 Douglas Fir 86 10 F-P/F Yes Retain Over extended branches. Epicormics. Uneven canopy. Deadwood. Shared ownership.
452 Douglas Fir 90 11 F/F Yes Retain 10+cm hanger. Over extended branches. Rooted on bedrock. Shared ownership.
453 Douglas Fir 52 6 P/P Yes Park Habitat Tree Previously topped. Stem deflections. Dieback. 10cm Deadwood.
454 Douglas Fir 36 4 Dead Yes Park Habitat Tree Dead.
455 Douglas Fir 61 7 F-P/G-F Yes Park Habitat Tree Epicormics. Dieback. Deadwood. Over extended branches. Uneven canopy.
456 Douglas Fir 67 8 F-P/F Yes Park Habitat Tree Epicormics. Dieback. 10cm Deadwood. Over extended branches. Uneven canopy. Lean.
457 Douglas Fir 19 2 F-P/F No Park Habitat Tree Dieback. Deadwood. Suppressed. Understory. Over extended branches. Possible fungal infection.
458 Douglas Fir 24 3 F-P/P Yes Park Habitat Tree Dieback. Deadwood. Suppressed. Understory. Over extended branches. Possible fungal infection. Topped.
459 Douglas Fir 29 3 F/F-P Yes Strata Lot Removal Over extended branches. Stem deflections. Uneven canopy. Resinosis.
460 Arbutus 51 6 P/F Yes Strata Lot Removal Dieback. 10cm Deadwood. Little foliar area. Development within CRZ.
461 Pacific yew 24 3 F-P/P Yes Strata Lot Removal Basal damage. Dieback. Deadwood. Epicormics. Rooted on rock. Topped.
462 Red alder 33 4 P/F-P Yes Strata Lot Removal Lean. Stem dieback. Epicormics.
463 Douglas Fir 75 9 F/F Yes Strata Lot Removal Dieback. 10cm Deadwood. Uneven canopy. Hangers. Over extended branches.
464 Douglas Fir 67 8 F-P/F Yes Strata Lot Removal Stem deflections. Epicormics. 10cm deadwood. Resinosis. Over extended branches.
465 Douglas Fir 48 6 F/P Yes Strata Lot Removal Dieback. 5cm Deadwood. Epicormics. Over extended branches. Topped.
466 Douglas Fir 27 3 F-P/F-P Yes Strata Lot Removal Suppressed. Understory. Galls on branches. Over extended branches.
467 Douglas Fir 75 9 F/F-P Yes Lot E Removal Resinosis. Swollen basal stem. Epicormics. Over extended branches. Uneven canopy.
468 Douglas Fir 60 7 F/F Yes Lot E Removal Stem deflections. Epicormics. Dieback. Deadwood.
469 Douglas Fir 20 2 F/P Yes Lot E Removal Suppressed. Dieback. Deadwood. Stem deflections. Topped. Over extended branches.
470 Douglas Fir 26 3 F-P/P Yes Strata Lot Removal Dieback. Deadwood. Uneven canopy. Epicormics. Rooted on rock. Basal cavity.
471 Douglas Fir 69 8 P/P Yes Strata Lot Removal Stem dieback. Dead top. 10cm deadwood.
472 Douglas Fir 59 7 P/F Yes Strata Lot Removal Significant dieback. 10cm deadwood. Over extended branches.
473 Douglas Fir 89 11 F-P/F Yes Strata Lot Removal Significant dieback. 10cm deadwood. Over extended branches. Stem deflections. Epicormics.
474 Arbutus 27 3 F/P Yes Strata Lot Removal Basal cavity. Dieback.
475 Arbutus 22 3 F-P/F Yes Strata Lot Removal Dieback. Little foliar area. Mutated root crown. Suspected internal decay.
476 Arbutus 28 3 F-P/F-P Yes Strata Lot Removal Dieback. Little foliar area. Mutated root crown. Suspected internal decay.
477 Douglas Fir 36 4 P/F-P Yes Strata Lot Removal High cone production. Dieback. Deadwood. Uneven canopy. Epicormics. Slight lean.
478 Douglas Fir 40 5 F-P/F-P Yes Strata Road Removal High cone production. Dieback. Deadwood. Uneven canopy. Epicormics. Slight lean.
479 Douglas Fir 27 3 F/F-P Yes Strata Lot Removal Lean. Dieback. Deadwood. Rooted next to dead stump.
480 Arbutus 31 4 G-F/G Yes Strata Lot Removal Hanger. Mutated root crown. Epicormics.
481 Arbutus 24 3 P/P Yes Strata Lot Removal Stem dieback. Serious decline. Cavities in basal stem. Uneven canopy.
482 Arbutus 26 3 P/P Yes Strata Lot Removal Stem dieback. Serious decline. Cavities in basal stem. Uneven canopy.
483 Douglas Fir 42 5 F-P/P Yes Strata Road Removal Dieback. 10cm Deadwood. Lean, previously partial root failure. High cone productions.
484 Douglas Fir 62 7 F-P/F Yes Strata Road Removal Rope girdled. Stem deflections. Dieback. 10cm Deadwood. Resinosis. Reaction wood on south side of trunk.
485 Douglas Fir 46 6 F-P/P Yes Strata Road Removal Over extended branches. Lean. Dieback. Deadwood.
486 Douglas Fir 54 6 F-P/P Yes Strata Road Removal Uneven canopy. Dieback. Deadwood. Epicormics. Stem dieback. Rope girdled.
487 Douglas Fir 50 6 F-P/F-P Yes Vision Way Removal Uneven canopy. Dieback. Deadwood. Epicormics. Stem dieback.
488 Douglas Fir 25 3 F/F Yes Vision Way Removal Lean swollen basal stem. Dieback. Deadwood. Epicormics.
489 Douglas Fir 21 3 F-P/F-P Yes Vision Way Removal Lean swollen basal stem. Dieback. Deadwood. Epicormics.
490 Douglas Fir 38 5 F/F Yes Vision Way Removal Lean swollen basal stem. Dieback. Deadwood.
491 Douglas Fir 33 4 P/F-P Yes Vision Way Removal Lean swollen basal stem. Dieback. Deadwood.
492 Shore pine 34 4 F-P/P Yes Vision Way Removal Lean. Codominant top. Previously topped. Suppressed. Understory. Deadwood.
493 Douglas Fir 37 4 F-P/P Yes Vision Way Removal Lean. Codominant top. Previously topped. Suppressed. Understory. Deadwood.
494 Douglas Fir 28 3 P/P Yes Vision Way Removal Little live foliar area. Dieback. Deadwood. Topped. Lean.
495 Douglas Fir 24 3 F/P Yes Lot D Removal Lean. Codominant top. Previously topped. Suppressed. Understory. Deadwood.
496 Douglas Fir 44 5 F-P/P Yes Lot D Removal Grafted to 497 at grade. Stem deflections. Poor live crown ratio. Epicormics. Dieback. 5cm Deadwood.
497 Douglas Fir 41 5 F-P/P Yes Lot D Removal Grafted to 496 at grade. Stem deflections. Poor live crown ratio. Epicormics. Dieback. 5cm Deadwood.
498 Douglas Fir 57 7 F-P/F-P Yes Retain Dieback. 10cm Deadwood. Epicormics. Over extended branches. Lean. Shared ownership.
499 Douglas Fir 76 9 F-P/P Yes Lot D Removal Lean. Stem deflections. Over extended branches. Dieback. Deadwood.
500 Douglas Fir 33 4 F/P Yes Lot D Removal Topped. Poor live crown ratio. Suppressed. Understory.
551 Douglas Fir 31 4 F-P/P Yes Lot D Removal Lean. Uneven canopy. Over extended branches. Dieback. 5cm Deadwood. Topped.
552 Douglas Fir 33 4 F-P/P Yes Lot D Removal Stem deflections. Poor live crown ratio. Dieback. Deadwood. Uneven canopy.
553 Douglas Fir 54 6 F-P/P Yes Lot D Removal Stem deflections. Poor live crown ratio. Dieback. Deadwood.
554 Douglas Fir 74 9 F-P/P Yes Lot D Removal Sweeping stem at grade. Epicormics. Dieback. 10cm Deadwood. Poor live crown ratio.
555 Shore pine 29 3 F/F-P Yes Retain Uneven canopy. Topped. Sap deposit on wound 1.5m above grade. Private Tree.
556 Douglas Fir 51 6 F-P/P Yes Lot D Removal Codominant stems 1.8m above grade. Resinosis. Poor aspect ratio. Narrow angle of attachment and included bark in union. Dieback. Deadwood. Seam in below union.
557 Douglas Fir 29 3 F/P Yes Lot D Removal Lean. Stem deflections. Resinosis. High cone production.
558 Douglas Fir 23 3 F/F Yes Lot D Removal Lean. Possible fungal infection. Swollen basal stem. Dense foliage. Understory.
559 Douglas Fir 53 6 F-P/F-P Yes Lot D Removal Poor live crown ratio. Stem deflections. Over extended branches. Ivy. Above grade structural roots.
560 Douglas Fir 26 3 F-P/F-P Yes Lot D Removal Suppressed. Resinosis. Basal damage. Stem deflections. Dieback. Deadwood.
561 Douglas Fir 67 8 F-P/P Yes Vision Way Removal Stem deflections. Dieback. 10cm Deadwood. Poor live crown ratio. Basal cavity.
562 Douglas Fir 68 8 F-P/P Yes Vision Way Removal Sweeping stem at grade. Dieback. 10cm Deadwood. Over extended branches.
563 Arbutus 50 6 F/F-P Yes Vision Way Removal Uneven canopy. Minor dieback. Phototrophic growth.
564 Douglas Fir 58 7 P/P Yes Vision Way Removal Lean. Dieback and deadwood. Sparse canopy. Stem deflections.
565 Douglas Fir 33 4 F-P/P Yes Vision Way Removal Severe lean. Dieback. Deadwood. Topped.
566 Douglas Fir 48 6 Dead Yes Vision Way Removal Dead.
567 Douglas Fir 45 5 F-P/P Yes Vision Way Removal Sweeping stem at grade. Dieback. Deadwood. Resinosis.
568 Douglas Fir 45 5 F-P/F-P Yes Vision Way Removal Poor live crown ratio. Over extended branches. Sparse canopy.
569 Shore pine 57 7 F-P/P Yes Vision Way Removal Sparse canopy. Stem deflections. Dieback. Deadwood.
570 Douglas Fir 60 7 F-P/F Yes Strata Road Removal Dieback. Deadwood. Over extended branches. Epicormics. Slight lean.
571 Douglas Fir 39 5 F/F Yes Strata Lot Removal Minor deadwood. High cone production. Dense foliage. Poor taper.
572 Douglas Fir 28 3 F-P/F Yes Strata Lot Removal Suppressed. Understory. Dieback. Wound 5m above grade.
573 Douglas Fir 40 5 P/F-P Yes Strata Lot Removal Dieback. Deadwood. High cone production. Sparse canopy. Sweeping stem.
574 Douglas Fir 27 3 P/P Yes Strata Lot Removal Dieback. Deadwood. Codominant top. Previously topped.
575 Douglas Fir 42 5 F-P/P Yes Strata Lot Removal Stem deflections. Dieback. Deadwood.
576 Douglas Fir 41 5 F/F-P Yes Strata Lot Removal Gravel up to root crown. Development in CRZ. Dieback. Epicormics. Lean.
577 Douglas Fir 64 8 F/F-P Yes Strata Lot Removal Resinosis. Roots likely cut during development in CRZ. Large hanger. Epicormics. Over extended limbs. Deadwood.
578 Douglas Fir 100 12 F/P Yes Strata Lot Removal Dieback. Deadwood. Over extended branches. Large roots cut during development in CRZ.
579 Shore pine 25 3 F-P/P Yes Strata Lot Removal Poor live crown ratio. Understory tree. Little foliar area. Torsion crack.
580 Douglas Fir 25 3 P/F-P Yes Strata Lot Removal Sweeping stem at grade. Over extended branches. Epicormics. Understory tree. Mechanical damage to basal stem.
581 Douglas Fir 25 3 F-P/P Yes Strata Lot Removal Sweeping stem at grade. Over extended branches. Epicormics. Understory tree.
582 Grand fir 51 6 F-P/F-P Yes Strata Lot Removal Dieback. Low vigour. Sweeping stem. Uneven canopy.
583 Douglas Fir 63 8 F-P/F-P Yes Vision Way Removal Stem deflections. Overextended branches. Dieback. Deadwood. Resinosis.
584 Douglas Fir 54 6 F-P/F-P Yes Vision Way Removal Stem deflections. Overextended branches. Dieback. Deadwood.
585 Douglas Fir 60 7 F-P/P Yes Vision Way Removal Overextended limbs. Dieback. 10cm Deadwood. Topped.
586 Douglas Fir 56 7 P/F-P Yes Vision Way Removal Dieback. Dieback. 10cm Deadwood. Little foliar area. Poor live crown ratio.
587 Douglas Fir 58 7 F-P/F-P Yes Vision Way Removal Poor live crown ratio. Over extended branches. Dieback.
588 Douglas Fir 26 3 F/P Yes Vision Way Removal Understory tree. Uneven canopy. Stem deflections. Topped.
589 Douglas Fir 35 4 F/P Yes Vision Way Removal Sweeping stem at grade. Previous partial uproot. Dieback. Deadwood.
590 Arbutus 67 8 F/F-P Yes Vision Way Removal Sweeping stem at grade. Deadwood.
591 Douglas Fir 62 7 F/F-P Yes Retain Over extended branches. Deadwood. Uneven canopy. Private Tree.
592 Douglas Fir 50 6 F/F Yes Retain Uneven canopy. Dieback. Deadwood. Private Tree.
593 Douglas Fir 36 4 F-P/P Yes Retain Lean. Dieback. Deadwood. Suppressed. Private Tree.
594 Cherry 22 3 F-P/P Yes Lot C Removal Lean. Basal decay with ramshorns. Dieback. Deadwood.
595 Cherry 22 3 F-P/P Yes Lot C Removal Basal decay with ramshorns. Dieback. Deadwood. Stem deflections.
596 Douglas Fir 33 4 F-P/P Yes Lot C Removal Sweeping stem. Dieback. Deadwood. Resinosis. Epicormics.
597 Douglas Fir 25 3 F-P/F-P Yes Lot C Removal Lean. Dieback. Deadwood. Epicormics.
598 Douglas Fir 76 9 F-P/F-P Yes Lot C Removal Epicormics. Resinosis. Over extended branches. Deadwood.
599 Douglas Fir 53 6 F/P Yes Lot C Removal Sweeping stem. Rooted adjacent to cut and compartmentalized stump. Uneven canopy.
600 Douglas Fir 54 6 F/F-P Yes Lot C Removal Poor live crown ratio. Epicormics. Over extended branches. Ramshorns on basal stem.
735 Garry Oak 14 2 P/P No Strata Lot Removal Understory tree. Pest damage to stem.
736 Douglas Fir 69 8 P/P Yes Strata Lot Removal Severe dieback. Extensive dead wood. Sloughing bark. Unsuitable to retain.
737 Douglas Fir 57 7 P/P Yes Strata Road Removal Resinosis. Poor taper. Branch dieback. In decline. Unsuitable to retain.
738 Douglas Fir 53 6 P/P Yes Park Habitat Tree Branch dieback. In decline. Phellinus werii present. Unsuitable to retain.
739 Douglas Fir 97 12 P/P Yes Strata Lot Removal Pest infestation. Sloughing bark. Stem deflection. Dead wood. In decline. Unsuitable to retain. Exposed roots-possible shift.
740 Douglas Fir 49 6 P/P Yes Strata Lot Removal Stem damage. Stressed. Sub-average elongation of new growth. Unsuitable to retain.
741 Douglas Fir 86 10 P/P Yes Strata Lot Removal Unbalanced canopy. Significant branch dieback. In decline. Unsuitable to retain.
742 Douglas Fir 56 7 P/P Yes Strata Lot Removal Poor stem taper. Significant branch dieback. In decline. Epicormic. Unsuitable to retain.
743 Douglas Fir 72 9 P/P Yes Strata Road Removal In decline. Branch dieback. Epicormic. Unsuitable to retain.
Page 42–59

Appendix ‘B’ — Photos and Site Plan

Figure 1. Site Plan.

Site Plan — part 1
Site Plan — part 1
Site Plan — part 2
Site Plan — part 2
Site Plan — part 3
Site Plan — part 3

Figure 2. View of Southeastern edge of site.

View of southeastern edge of site
View of southeastern edge of site

Figure 3. Park Tree Canopies. Deadwood and dieback visible in most of the canopies.

Park tree canopies showing deadwood and dieback
Park tree canopies showing deadwood and dieback

Figure 4. Southern section of site. Note rocky outcrops and existing houses.

Page 42–59

Document Images

(2)
Extracted from: Agenda(256 pages total)