This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.

MeetingsMon, Dec 15, 20254h 06m2022–2026 Council

Regular Council

Connecting to video…

Summary

  • Directed staff to engage a consultant to verify and scope a municipally‑contracted residential curbside garbage service (waste report)
  • Directed staff to increase public waste receptacle pickups from seven to fourteen weekly; no seasonal restrictions (waste)
  • Directed staff to update off‑street parking and bicycle rules using options 1a and 4a; require five‑year review (Watt)
  • Adopted housing agreements requiring affordable rental units at 2772 Vantilburg Crescent and 814 Hockley Avenue (Bylaws 2257, 2264)
  • Approved a three‑year temporary use permit and development variance permit for a bakery at 116‑832 McCallum Road (TUP25‑0003/DVP25‑0003)

Decisions

What council voted on, in agenda order.

8 decisions
  • Issued a temporary use permit and parking variance allowing a bakery at 116-832 McCallum Road.

    8.1 · TUP25-0003 and DVP25-0003 - 116-832 McCallum Road

    Moved by Wagner, seconded by Guiry
  • Issued a 36-month temporary use permit for a cannabis retail store at 101-945 Reunion Avenue.

    8.2 · TUP25-0004 - 101-945 Reunion Avenue (Original Farm)

    Moved by Wagner, seconded by Guiry
  • Issued a development variance permit with conditions and density covenant for 932 Rowils Crescent.

    8.4 · DVP25-0001 - 932 Rowils Crescent

    Moved by Wagner, seconded by Guiry
  • Directed staff to prepare an updated off-street parking bylaw based on Watt Consulting recommendations.

    9.1 · Parking Bylaw Modernization and Downtown On‑Street Parking Strategy

    Moved by Szpak, seconded by Morley
  • Directed staff to increase public receptacle collection, adopt new receptacles, and review municipal curbside service.

    9.2 · Options for Better Waste Management

    Vote 7–0Moved by Yacucha, seconded by Harder
  • Adopted the housing agreement for 2772 Vantilburg Crescent.

    12.1 · Bylaw NO. 2257 - City of Langford Housing Agreement (2772 Vantilburg Crescent) Bylaw No. 2257, 2025 (Adoption)

    Vote 7–0Moved by Guiry, seconded by Harder
  • Adopted the park dedication bylaw amendment.

    12.2 · Bylaw NO. 2261 - City of Langford Park Dedication Bylaw No. 2218, 2025, Amendment No. 1 (Adoption)

    Vote 7–0Moved by Harder, seconded by Morley
  • Adopted the housing agreement for 814 Hockley Avenue.

    12.3 · Bylaw NO. 2264 - City of Langford Housing Agreement (814 Hockley Avenue) Bylaw No. 2264, 2025 (Adoption)

    Vote 7–0Moved by Wagner, seconded by Harder

Agenda

19 items · select one for details, debate and documents

Summary

Meeting was called to order by the Mayor.

proceduralopening

Summary

Territorial Acknowledgement was read aloud for the record.

procedural

Summary

Moderator read the public participation and meeting conduct rules.

proceduralpublic_process

Summary

Council approved the meeting agenda as presented.

Motions (1)

PassedMoved by C. Harder

THAT Council approve the agenda as presented.

agenda

Summary

Consultants from Watt Consulting presented recommendations for downtown on‑street parking management and an off‑street parking bylaw modernization to align parking supply with demand and best practices.

Debate

Consultants presented data showing the downtown overall has sufficient parking supply but uneven block-level demand; recommendations emphasized improved management (time limits, signage, enforcement), removal or reduction of minimum off‑street parking in the city centre combined with TDM measures, and modernized bike/accessible/loading standards. Council asked detailed operational questions about TDM feasibility, transit dependency, enforcement, and effects on local businesses.

Documents (1)

Engagement summary by Watt Consulting presenting methodology, online survey (271 responses), focus group findings, and key takeaways used to inform the parking bylaw modernization recommendations.

Engagement period: online survey June 20–July 14, 2025Survey responses: 271Key findings: 54.6% support parking requirements by land use designation; top parking challenges include vehicles parking on residential streets and difficulty finding downtown parkingIncludes detailed retrofit and design recommendations for public bins (later used in waste management report)
Langford Parking Bylaw Modernization — Engagement Summary

Loading…

Page 34–55
Table of Contents

Loading…

Page 34–55
Project Overview

Loading…

Page 34–55
Engagement Objectives & Timeline

Loading…

Page 34–55
Methodology

Loading…

Page 34–55
Online Survey Results — Parking & Travel Behaviour

Loading…

Page 34–55
Online Survey Results — Parking & Travel Behaviour (Challenges)

Loading…

Page 34–55
Online Survey Results — Accessible Parking

Loading…

Page 34–55
Online Survey Results — Commercial Parking

Loading…

Page 34–55
Online Survey Results — Proposed Changes to the Parking Bylaw

Loading…

Page 34–55
Online Survey Results — Proposed Changes to the Parking Bylaw (Factors for Reducing Parking Requirements)

Loading…

Page 34–55
Online Survey Results — Bicycle Parking

Loading…

Page 34–55
Online Survey Results — Demographics

Loading…

Page 34–55
Focus Groups Results

Loading…

Page 34–55
Key Takeaways

Loading…

Page 34–55
View full document
parkingtransportationbylawWatt Consulting

Summary

Members of the public spoke to items 5.1 (parking), 9.2 (waste), 8.4 (Rowils Crescent variance), and other items; speakers raised concerns about paid parking, parking availability, waste pickup frequency, municipal garbage collection, and local development impacts.

Who spoke (10)

  • Chris FoxallConcerned · Parking minimums
    Warns that reducing parking could leave residents without needed spaces, while supporting shared parking and lower housing costs.
  • Lisa FoxallConcerned · Waste management and parking
    Calls for more frequent public-bin pickups and warns parking limits and paid parking could hurt local businesses.
  • M. WignallOpposes · Waste management and parking
    Opposes municipal garbage collection and reduced parking requirements, urging more frequent pickups and retaining parking until future demand is clear.
  • N. JoelOpposes · Parking and waste management
    Opposes reduced parking and municipal garbage collection, citing parking shortages and arguing competition keeps waste costs down.
  • R. Fraser (Rowils Crescent)Concerned · Rowils Crescent variance
    Raises concerns about parking, drainage, speeding, and unclear access requirements for the proposed development.
  • Wendy HobbsOpposes · Waste management
    Urges more frequent public-bin pickups instead of municipal collection, citing household costs, effects on workers, and residents' choice.
  • L. PlompMixed · Parking and waste management
    Questions parking-study assumptions and accessibility impacts, and asks for a consultant review of municipal garbage collection costs.
  • A residentOpposes · Waste management
    Opposes mandatory garbage service and added taxpayer costs, urging more frequent public-bin pickups and preserving household choice.
  • Tanya SunshineSupports · Waste management
    Supports a municipally contracted garbage service, citing cost efficiency, effectiveness, and fewer trucks on the road.
  • D. StrongerSupports · Rowils Crescent variance
    Supports the requested variances, citing staff and committee review and proposed covenants limiting units and securing access and future road rights-of-way.

Summarized from the meeting video. Names use checked registry spellings; unconfirmed names appear as “A resident”.

Location

932 Rowils Crescent

Debate

Public speakers expressed mixed views: some supported improved parking management but opposed paid downtown parking and removal of minimums; many called for more frequent public waste receptacle pickup and opposed forcing municipal collection; affected neighbours raised concerns about flooding and parking for 932 Rowils Crescent.

Motions (1)

PassedMoved by C. Harder

THAT Council at 9:00 pm extend public participation for first time speakers.

public_input

Summary

Council adopted the December 1, 2025 minutes.

Motions (1)

PassedMoved by C. Harder

THAT Council adopt the minutes of the Council Meeting held on December 1, 2025.

minutes
8
Section 8

Summary

Council issued a Temporary Use Permit (3 years) and a variance to reduce off‑street parking requirement for a bakery at Unit 116-832 McCallum Road.

Location

116-832 McCallum Road

Debate

Council approved the TUP and accompanying variance; public input included support from nearby residents/businesses and no substantive opposition recorded in Minutes.

Motions (1)

PassedMoved by M. Wagner

THAT Temporary Use Permit No. TUP25-0003 be issued by the Council for the City of Langford to Ahura Yurchenko to operate a bakery at 116-832 McCallum Road, pursuant to section 493 of the Local Government Act, subject to conditions; AND THAT Development Variance Permit No. DVP25-0003 be issued to reduce off‑street parking for the bakery as described.

Documents (5)

Temporary Use Permit TUP25-0003 for operation of a bakery at Unit 116-832 McCallum Road, issued for three years with conditions.

Address: 116-832 McCallum RoadUse: BakeryTerm: 3 yearsConditions: Building Dept. tenant improvement approval, City business licence, permit non-renewal if off-street parking becomes a problem
CITY OF LANGFORD

Loading…

Page 9
View full document

Public notice flyer announcing the Council meeting (Dec 15, 2025) to consider TUP25-0003 and DVP25-0003 for a bakery at 116-832 McCallum Road, with participation instructions.

Meeting date: December 15, 2025 at 7:00PMFiles: TUP25-0003 and DVP25-0003Location: 116-832 McCallum Road (Mixed Use Employment MUE2)Contact email: planning@langford.ca
Notice of Intent

Loading…

Page 10
IMPORTANT – COUNCIL MEETING NOTICE

Loading…

Page 10
View full document

Printed newspaper/public notice content (Goldstream Gazette pages) that include the City's Notice of Intention regarding TUP25-0003 (and general community news).

Publication: Goldstream Gazette (dates in December 2025)Contains notice of intention wording and mapSupports public notification for TUP/DVP items
Victoria’s Mandy Farmer brings home business leader of the year award

Loading…

Page 11–12
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING — District of Metchosin

Loading…

Page 11–12
Notice of Intention to Consider Issuance of a Temporary Use Permit — City of Langford

Loading…

Page 11–12
CRD housing targets 5,000 rental homes by 2045

Loading…

Page 11–12
Mary Winspear Centre — Presenter Series

Loading…

Page 11–12
View full document

Development Variance Permit DVP25-0003 to reduce the off-street parking requirement for a bakery at Unit 116-832 McCallum Road from 1 per 20m2 to 1 per 45m2; variance tied to Temporary Use Permit expiry.

Address: 116-832 McCallum RoadVariance: Parking ratio from 1/20m2 to 1/45m2Condition: variance invalid upon expiry of the Temporary Use Permit (TUP25-0003)
CITY OF LANGFORD

Loading…

Page 13
View full document

Additional copy/continuation of the Council meeting Notice of Intent concerning TUP25-0003 and DVP25-0003 (format similar to earlier flyer).

Meeting: Dec 15, 2025 at 7:00 PMFiles: TUP25-0003 & DVP25-0003Location: 116-832 McCallum Road
Notice of Intent

Loading…

Page 14
IMPORTANT – COUNCIL MEETING NOTICE

Loading…

Page 14
View full document
TUPDVPcommercialbakeryparking

Summary

Council issued a 36‑month Temporary Use Permit to allow a non‑medical cannabis retail store at Unit #101-945 Reunion Avenue, subject to comprehensive conditions (hours, signage, security, opaque windows, etc.).

Location

#101-945 Reunion Avenue

Debate

Council approved TUP25-0004 after staff report; the business previously operated or had community engagement and no outstanding issues reported in Minutes.

Motions (1)

PassedMoved by M. Wagner

THAT Temporary Use Permit No. TUP25-0004 be issued by the Council for the City of Langford to The Original Farm Langford Ltd. to operate a non‑medical cannabis retail store at #101‑945 Reunion Avenue subject to the listed conditions; expiry 36 months.

Documents (3)

Temporary Use Permit TUP25-0004 authorizing The Original Farm Langford Ltd. to operate a non‑medical cannabis retail store at #101-945 Reunion Avenue for 36 months subject to detailed conditions on signage, security, hours, and tenant education.

Address: 101-945 Reunion Avenue (Belmont Market and Residences C10)Use: Non‑medical cannabis retail storeTerm: 36 months (expires Dec 15, 2029)Conditions: opaque windows, limited signage (3 signs max), hours 9am-9pm Sun-Wed and 9am-10pm Thu-Sat, security and odour control measures per RFP
CITY OF LANGFORD

Loading…

Page 15–17
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT

Loading…

Page 15–17
1. Conditions

Loading…

Page 15–17
2. Whereas

Loading…

Page 15–17
3. Expiry

Loading…

Page 15–17
View full document

Public notice flyer for Council meeting to consider TUP25-0004 to continue the existing cannabis operation at 101-945 Reunion Avenue, including participation instructions.

Meeting date: December 15, 2025, 7:00PMFile: TUP25-0004Location: 101-945 Reunion Avenue; Zoning: C10
Notice of Intent

Loading…

Page 18
IMPORTANT – COUNCIL MEETING NOTICE

Loading…

Page 18
View full document

Local newspaper pages containing the public notices and related community articles used for statutory advertising for the TUP25-0004 matter and other items.

Goldstream Gazette publication pages (December 2025)Contain notice of intention to consider Temporary Use Permit TUP25-0004
Get up close and personal with wild animals

Loading…

Page 19–20
Robotic surgery has Victoria man back on his bike in 2 weeks

Loading…

Page 19–20
View full document
TUPcannabis retailsignagesecurity

Summary

Council issued a TUP (3 years) to operate a home‑based business and granted a variance reducing required off‑street parking for the dwelling from 2 stalls to 1 stall (conditions: garage to remain primary parking; driveway available for client during hours of operation).

Location

933 Tayberry Terrace

Debate

Council approved the TUP and DVP for a low‑impact home‑based cosmetic business; staff and councillors noted driveway space and one client at a time so impacts are minimal.

Motions (1)

PassedMoved by M. Wagner

THAT Temporary Use Permit No. TUP25-0005 be issued by the Council for the City of Langford to Hayan Lee to operate a home‑based business at 933 Tayberry Terrace, and THAT Development Variance Permit No. DVP25‑0005 be issued to vary the parking requirement per conditions.

Documents (5)

Temporary Use Permit TUP25-0005 issued to Hayan Lee to operate a home-based business at 933 Tayberry Terrace for three years subject to business licence and primary residence condition.

Address: 933 Tayberry TerraceUse: Home-based businessTerm: 3 yearsConditions: business licence required; home must remain primary residence
CITY OF LANGFORD

Loading…

Page 21
View full document

Public notice flyer for Council meeting to consider TUP25-0005 and DVP25-0005 for 933 Tayberry Terrace, with instructions for participation and contact information.

Meeting: December 15, 2025 at 7:00PMFiles: TUP25-0005 and DVP25-0005Location: 933 Tayberry Terrace (CD10)
Notice of Intent

Loading…

Page 22
IMPORTANT – COUNCIL MEETING NOTICE

Loading…

Page 22
View full document

Local newspaper pages containing the public notices and other community content relevant to TUP25-0005 and other agenda items.

Goldstream Gazette public noticesIncludes Notice of Intention to Consider TUP25-0005
Get up close and personal with wild animals

Loading…

Page 23–24
City of Langford

Loading…

Page 23–24
West Shore handyDART users invited to provide input on long-term plan

Loading…

Page 23–24
Victoria real estate heads into the holidays in a lull

Loading…

Page 23–24
Young at Heart — Seniors Expo (Ad)

Loading…

Page 23–24
View full document

Development Variance Permit DVP25-0005 to reduce the off-street parking requirement for a one-family dwelling at 933 Tayberry Terrace from two stalls to one stall; conditions tie the variance to the Temporary Use Permit.

Address: 933 Tayberry TerraceVariance: residential parking requirement from 2 stalls to 1 stall (garage used for primary residence; driveway for client during business hours)Condition: variance invalid upon expiry of Temporary Use Permit
CITY OF LANGFORD

Loading…

Page 25
DEVELOPMENT VARIANCE PERMIT

Loading…

Page 25
View full document

Additional notice/flyer for the December 15, 2025 Council meeting regarding TUP25-0005 and DVP25-0005 at 933 Tayberry Terrace.

Meeting: Dec 15, 2025 7:00PMFiles: TUP25-0005 & DVP25-0005Location: 933 Tayberry Terrace
Notice of Intent

Loading…

Page 26
View full document
TUPhome‑based businessDVPparking

Summary

Council issued DVP25‑0001 permitting variance requests (panhandle lot in R2 zone; reduced front and rear setbacks) subject to conditions including a Section 219 covenant limiting density to two dwelling units per lot.

Location

932 Rowils Crescent

Debate

Neighbours raised concerns re: parking, drainage and access; staff and applicant explained required covenants, access easement, environmental confirmation and stormwater requirements will be addressed through the development/subdivision process. SDAC recommended in favour and council carried the motion.

Motions (1)

PassedMoved by M. Wagner

THAT Development Variance Permit No. DVP25‑0001 be issued by the Council to permit a residential development at 932 Rowils Crescent subject to the variances and conditions as listed, including a Section 219 covenant limiting density.

Documents (2)

Development Variance Permit DVP25-0001 to allow a panhandle lot in the R2 zone and to reduce front and rear lot line setbacks to permit duplexes on proposed lots, subject to a Section 219 covenant limiting density.

Address: 932 Rowils CrescentVariances: permit panhandle lot in R2 zone; front setback from 3.0m to 1.5m; rear setback from 3.0m to 1.51mCondition: Section 219 covenant limiting each lot to maximum of two dwelling units
CITY OF LANGFORD

Loading…

Page 27
View full document

Public notice flyer advising Council will consider DVP25-0001 (932 Rowils Crescent) at the Dec 15, 2025 meeting, with location map and participation instructions.

Meeting: December 15, 2025, 7:00PMFile: DVP25-0001Location: 932 Rowils Crescent (R2 zoning)
Notice of Intent

Loading…

Page 28
IMPORTANT – COUNCIL MEETING NOTICE

Loading…

Page 28
View full document
DVPsubdivisionsetbacksenvironmental
9
Section 9

Summary

Council directed staff to prepare a bylaw to update Part 4 (Off‑Street Parking & Bicycle Regulations) of Zoning Bylaw No. 300 based on Watt Consulting's nine recommendations (including options 1A and 4A); Council also directed staff to create a policy requiring a review of off‑street parking requirements at least every five years (amendment by Cllr Yacucha).

Debate

Extensive discussion: councillors asked about transit dependency of removing parking minimums, risk of spillover parking to adjacent neighbourhoods, enforcement capacity, cash‑in‑lieu rates, loading and impacts on businesses; amendment added a five‑year review requirement. The motion carried as amended (main motion moved by Szpak; amendment moved by Yacucha and carried).

Motions (2)

PassedMoved by L. Szpak

THAT Council direct staff to prepare a bylaw to update Part 4: Off‑Street Parking and Bicycle Regulations of Zoning Bylaw No. 300 based on the nine recommendations from Watt Consulting Group's presentation, including option 1A and 4A.

PassedMoved by K. Yacucha

AMENDMENT: THAT Council direct staff to create a policy which requires a review of the off‑street parking requirements not less than every five years.

parkingzoningTDMtransportationbylaw

Summary

Council directed staff to increase public waste receptacle collection frequency, adopt a new receptacle design, and engage a consultant to verify and, if appropriate, scope a municipally‑contracted residential curbside collection service; staff to prepare a regulatory bylaw.

Financial impact

$210,000— Proposed 2026 budget (staff estimate)

Debate

Staff recommended a staged approach: immediate action to increase public receptacle pick‑ups and upgrade receptacles; engage a consultant to verify municipal curbside collection (for 1–4 unit properties) so council can consider a service scope and tender if verified. Public delegates were split — many asked for more frequent pickups and opposed forced municipal collection citing competition, cost and job impacts; some supported municipal contracting for environmental and efficiency reasons. Staff estimated incremental contract cost for increased pickup (~$125k) plus consultant (~$85k) and noted these items were included in proposed 2026 budget.

Motions (1)

PassedMoved by K. Yacucha

THAT Council: 1. Increase the maximum level of service for public waste receptacle collection from seven (7) to fourteen (14) times per week, at the current contract unit rate, with no seasonal restrictions; 2. Adopt the proposed new style of waste receptacle and retrofit options; AND THAT Council direct staff to: 3. Engage a consultant to: a. Review and verify the staff recommendation to proceed with a municipally- contracted residential curbside garbage collection service; b. Advise and support the public survey and key partner engagement conducted by staff; c. If verified, prepare and present a proposed scope for the Municipal Garbage Service Contract to Council for information prior to going to tender; and 4. Prepare a bylaw to regulate the storage, collection, and disposal of garbage and organic waste in accordance with the CRD's Solid Waste Management Plan.

Documents (3)

Staff report responding to Council direction to explore improved waste management options; recommends increasing public receptacle collection frequency, adopting new bin designs, engaging a consultant to verify a municipally-contracted residential curbside garbage service, and preparing a related bylaw.

Report date: Monday, December 15, 2025Recommendations include: increase public waste receptacle service frequency from 7 to 14 times/week; engage consultant ($85,000 feasibility estimate); prepare bylaw for regulated storage/collectionEstimated short-term costs to include in 2026: up to $125,000 (increased pickup frequency), $75,000 (retrofit/replacement on Goldstream Avenue), $85,000 (feasibility study/RFP)Current public receptacle servicing under Roads Maintenance Contract: 244 cans; existing max service daily Apr–Sep (7/week)
Staff Report to Council

Loading…

Page 56–72
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Loading…

Page 56–72
BACKGROUND:

Loading…

Page 56–72
COMMENTARY: - Part 1 of 4

Loading…

Page 56–72
COMMENTARY: - Part 2 of 4

Loading…

Page 56–72
COMMENTARY: - Part 3 of 4

Loading…

Page 56–72
COMMENTARY: - Part 4 of 4

Loading…

Page 56–72
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:

Loading…

Page 56–72
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS:

Loading…

Page 56–72
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT:

Loading…

Page 56–72
OPTIONS:

Loading…

Page 56–72
SUBMITTED BY:

Loading…

Page 56–72
View full document

Map illustrating instances of overflowing public garbage cans across Langford from January to August 2025, with symbolized ranges of overflow counts.

Timeframe: January–August 2025Overflow instances: categorized (1, 2–10, 11–25, 26–50, 51–107 overflows)Shows city-wide distribution with concentrations downtown
Instances of Overflowing Garbage Cans

Loading…

Page 73
View full document

Appendix documenting existing public garbage can types in Langford, retrofit options, recommended future can designs (roadside and parks), estimated unit costs, and examples of education and wildlife management initiatives.

Existing can styles catalogued (Classic Langford, Hid-A-Bag, Pattison, Crowned, Solar/self-compacting, Victorian, etc.)Recommended standard roadside can cost estimate: $3,600 per can installationRecommended bear-proof parks/trails can: $2,515–$3,500 per installationEducation initiatives referenced: WildSafe BC bin tagging, Bear Smart Community Program, BC SPCA resources
Appendix B

Loading…

Page 74–98
Existing Garbage Bins

Loading…

Page 74–98
Retrofit Options

Loading…

Page 74–98
Recommended Future Garbage Can Design

Loading…

Page 74–98
Existing Signage, Initiatives, Campaigns, and Resources

Loading…

Page 74–98
Staff Recommendations (verbatim)

Loading…

Page 74–98
View full document
wasteservice_deliverycontractingrecycling
10
Section 10

Summary

Council appointed the Mayor as the City's representative to West Shore Parks & Recreation Society meetings for 2026.

Motions (1)

PassedMoved by K. Guiry

THAT Council approve the appointment of Mayor Goodmanson as the City of Langford's representative for the West Shore Parks & Recreation Society member meetings, including the annual general meeting for 2026.

Documents (1)

Staff correspondence requesting that the member municipalities appoint one elected official as their owner representative to the West Shore Parks & Recreation Society for 2026.

Date of report: December 3, 2025Request: appoint one elected official as owner representative for 2026 (AGM in June 2026)No budget impact
Introduction

Loading…

Page 99
MUNICIPAL OWNERS

Loading…

Page 99
View full document
correspondenceappointment

Summary

Notice of Motion: direct staff to review permitted uses in Business Park and Commercial zones and prepare bylaw amendments to permit uses such as pet grooming and bakery in those zones.

notice of motionzoning
12
Section 12

Summary

Council adopted Bylaw No. 2257 authorizing a housing agreement for 2772 Vantilburg Crescent.

Location

2772 Vantilburg Crescent

Motions (1)

PassedMoved by K. Guiry

THAT Council adopt "City of Langford Housing Agreement (2772 Vantilburg Crescent), Bylaw No. 2257, 2025".

Documents (1)

Bylaw authorizing a housing agreement and section 219 covenant related to strata-titled property (2772 Vantilburg Crescent) that provides long-term affordable rental housing obligations, definitions and registration requirements.

Bylaw No.: 2257 (Housing Agreement for 2772 Vantilburg Crescent)Pages include Schedule A: Housing Agreement terms and Site PlanKey terms: affordable rent defined as 10% below CMHC private apartment average rents; below-market rental unit obligations and 10-year expiry from occupancy permitPriority agreement executed with First West Credit Union registering City's charge priority (attached)
CITY OF LANGFORD

Loading…

Page 100–111
BYLAW NO. 2257

Loading…

Page 100–111
Schedule A

Loading…

Page 100–111
ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION

Loading…

Page 100–111
ARTICLE 2 USE AND CONSTRUCTION OF LANDS AND BELOW-MARKET RENTAL UNITS

Loading…

Page 100–111
ARTICLE 3 USE OF BELOW-MARKET RENTAL UNITS

Loading…

Page 100–111
ARTICLE 4 MISCELLANEOUS - Part 1 of 2

Loading…

Page 100–111
ARTICLE 4 MISCELLANEOUS - Part 2 of 2

Loading…

Page 100–111
PRIORITY AGREEMENT

Loading…

Page 100–111
View full document
bylawhousing agreement

Summary

Council adopted Bylaw No. 2261 amending the Park Dedication Bylaw.

Motions (1)

PassedMoved by C. Harder

THAT Council adopt "City of Langford Park Dedication Bylaw No. 2218, 2025, Amendment No. 1, Bylaw No. 2261, 2025".

Documents (2)

Short staff report recommending adoption of Park Dedication Bylaw No. 2218 Amendment No. 1 (Bylaw No. 2261) to dedicate a closed road portion as part of Woodlands Park following the Hockley Avenue road closure.

Council gave 1st, 2nd and 3rd readings on December 1, 2025Purpose: to dedicate closed road shown on Reference Plan EPP149463 into Woodlands ParkRecommendation: adopt Bylaw No. 2261, 2025
Staff Report to Council

Loading…

Page 112–113
BACKGROUND

Loading…

Page 112–113
COMMENTARY

Loading…

Page 112–113
OPTIONS

Loading…

Page 112–113
SUBMITTED BY

Loading…

Page 112–113
Concurrence

Loading…

Page 112–113
Attachments

Loading…

Page 112–113
View full document

Bylaw that amends City of Langford Park Dedication Bylaw No. 2218, 2025 by adding the portion of closed road shown on Reference Plan EPP149463 as section 7 of Schedule A (dedicating the closed road to Woodlands Park).

Bylaw No.: 2261, 2025Adds closed road on Reference Plan EPP149463 to park dedicationReadings given Dec 1, 2025
CITY OF LANGFORD

Loading…

Page 114
View full document
bylawparks

Summary

Council adopted Bylaw No. 2264 authorizing a housing agreement for 814 Hockley Avenue.

Location

814 Hockley Avenue

Motions (1)

PassedMoved by M. Wagner

THAT Council adopt "City of Langford Housing Agreement (814 Hockley Avenue) Bylaw No. 2264, 2025".

Documents (2)

Bylaw authorizing a housing agreement and section 219 covenant between The Hockley Development Ltd. and the City to secure a number of below-market rental units (10% of dwelling units) at 814 Hockley Avenue, including definitions, tenant eligibility and term (25 years).

Bylaw No.: 2264, 2025Location: Lot 1, Section 5, Esquimalt District, Plan EPP134408 (814 Hockley Avenue)Requirement: at least 8 below-market rental units representing 10% of total unitsTerm: agreement runs for 25 years from occupancy permit for Below-Market UnitsAffordable Rent definition: 10% below CMHC Private Apartment Average Rents
CITY OF LANGFORD

Loading…

Page 115–123
TERMS OF INSTRUMENT - PART 2

Loading…

Page 115–123
ARTICLE 1 — DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION

Loading…

Page 115–123
ARTICLE 2 — USE AND CONSTRUCTION OF LANDS AND BELOW-MARKET RENTAL UNITS

Loading…

Page 115–123
ARTICLE 3 — USE OF BELOW-MARKET RENTAL UNITS

Loading…

Page 115–123
ARTICLE 4 — MISCELLANEOUS - Part 1 of 2

Loading…

Page 115–123
ARTICLE 4 — MISCELLANEOUS - Part 2 of 2

Loading…

Page 115–123
View full document

Set of site plans, floor plans and architectural drawings related to the Hockley Residential development and associated housing agreement/bylaw documents.

Includes site plan, main floor and multiple level floor plans (A101, A202, A203, A204, A205, A206, A207 etc.)Drawings dated Oct 2024 / Nov 2023 depending on sheetLinked to Bylaw No. 2264 / housing agreement for 814 Hockley Avenue
Schedule A – Site Plan - Part 1 of 3

Loading…

Page 124–131
Schedule A – Site Plan - Part 2 of 3

Loading…

Page 124–131
Schedule A – Site Plan - Part 3 of 3

Loading…

Page 124–131
Images

Loading…

Page 124–131
View full document
bylawhousing agreement

Summary

Council adjourned the meeting.

Motions (1)

PassedMoved by K. Guiry

THAT Council adjourn the meeting.

adjournment