CITY OF LANGFORD BYLAW NO. 2158 — A BYLAW TO AMEND THE SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICING BYLAW NO. 1000 (AMENDMENT NO. 28)

BYLAW NO. 2158

A BYLAW TO AMEND THE SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICING BYLAW NO. 1000 (AMENDMENT NO. 28)

The Council of the City of Langford, in open meeting assembled, hereby enacts as follows:

1. The “Langford Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw No. 1000, 2009” is amended as follows:

a) In the preamble, by striking out “pursuant to Section 931 of the Local Government Act”,

b) In the preamble, by striking out “, pursuant to Section 938 of the Local Government Act”,

c) In section 2.3:

i. by striking out “Langford Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2008 (No. 1200)” and substituting “Community Plan”,

ii. by striking out “including without limitation the: (a) Land Title Act; (b) Local Government Act; (c) Community Charter; (d) Strata Property Act and Bare Land Strata Regulations; (e) Agricultural Land Commission Act; (f) Real Estate Act; (g) Land Survey Act; (h) Forest Land Reserve Act; (i) Waste Management Act; (j) Highway Act; (k) Builders Lien Act; (l) Water Act”,

d) By adding a new section 2.5 to read: “Schedules “1” through “15” are attached to and form part of this bylaw, and all works and services to be constructed and installed must be in accordance with the applicable schedules.”,

e) In section 4.0:

i. by adding a new definition, in alphabetical order, for “”Approved Species List” means the species list established and maintained by the Director of Parks;”,

ii. in the definition of “Community Plan” by striking out “Langford “Official Community Plan Bylaw No. 1200, 2008”” and substituting ““Langford Official Community Plan Bylaw 2200, 2025””,

iii. in the definition of “Professional Engineer” or “Consulting Engineer” by striking out “Engineers and Geoscientists Act” and substituting “Professional Governance Act, SBC 2018, c. 47”,

iv. in the definition of “Professional Geoscientist” by striking out “Engineers and Geoscientists Act” and substituting “Professional Governance Act, SBC 2018, c. 47”,

v. in the definition of “Works and Services Agreement” by striking out “s. 940” and substituting “s. 509”,

f) In Schedule 1:

i. in section 1.11.1.1. by adding “or Construction Acceptance” after “Substantial Performance”,

ii. in section 1.11.1.2. by adding “or Construction Acceptance” after “Substantial Performance”,

iii. in section 1.11.2. by adding “or Construction Acceptance” after “Substantial Performance”,

iv. in section 1.11.3. by adding “or Construction Acceptance” after “Substantial Performance”,

v. in section 1.11.6. by adding “or Construction Acceptance” after “Substantial Performance”,

vi. in section 1.13.3. by striking out “s.940 of”,

g) In Schedule 2, in section 2.1.1. by adding “electrical systems, street lighting,” after “fire hydrant systems,”,

h) In Schedule 3:

i. in section 3.1.3. by adding “any retaining wall or multiple parallel, adjacent, or terraced” after “For”,

ii. in section 3.1.3. by adding “in total height” after “1.2 meters”,

iii. in section 3.1.3. by adding “at the base of the lowest retaining wall to the top of the highest retaining wall” after “grade”,

iv. in section 3.1.3.3. by adding “current or future” before “hard surface”,

v. in section 3.1.4. by adding “or a row of boulders” after “boulder stack (non-face mortar)”,

vi. in section 3.1.4. by striking out “or cut or fill slopes requiring visible anchoring, meshing, fencing, or other mechanical stabilization measures within the next 10 years,”,

vii. in section 3.1.4. (a) by adding “that will fully screen the prohibited structures/treatments listed above” before “as approved by the Director of Parks”,

viii. in section 3.1.4. (b) by striking out “with exceptions for existing physical limitations, as approved by and to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering”,

ix. by adding a new section 3.1.13. after 3.1.12. to read: “Rock cut or fill slopes requiring permanent visible rockfall meshing, attenuators, barriers, catchment ditches, fencing, anchoring, bolting, or other mechanical stabilization measures (shotcrete prohibited) within the next 10 years must be installed in accordance with the approved geotechnical plan to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering and certified safe for intended use by the Engineer of Record prior to subdivision or building permit whichever is first, with the following exceptions:

(a) the works will be buried, removed, or replaced as part of the construction of the building, in accordance with the approved geotechnical plan to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering; or

(b) the works are temporary but necessary interim safety measures as recommended and overseen by the Engineer of Record, to be addressed in the geotechnical plan for approval.”

i) In Schedule 4:

i. in section 4.1. by adding “, Cross-Section,” after “Classification”,

ii. in section 4.1.1. by adding “and approve the ultimate or interim road cross-section” after “the classification”,

iii. in section 4.1.1. by adding “, in accordance with the current adopted Transportation Master Plan, Active Transportation Plan, and Frontage Delegation Bylaw No. 497 as updated from time to time, including but not limited to: all above-ground and below-ground utility locations, property accesses, traffic controls, regulatory signage, and all frontage features, surfacing, amenities, assets, or facilities located within the current or proposed highway right-of-way” after “improved”,

iv. in section 4.1.1. by adding “the road” after “The width of”,

v. in section 4.1.1. by adding “the ultimate road cross-section,” after “The width of the road right-of-way,”,

vi. in section 4.1.1. by adding “, Transportation Master Plan, and Active Transportation Plan” after “the Official Community Plan”,

vii. in section 4.1.1. by striking out “Reference shall be made to the City of Langford Street Atlas for road classifications and attached road cross sections in this bylaw.”,

viii. in section 4.3.1. by striking out “Table 4-1 and Figure 4-1 of this Bylaw and”,

ix. in section 4.3.1. by adding “the drawing “Typical Road X-Section” as attached to and forming part of this bylaw” after “in accordance with”,

x. in section 4.3.1. by adding “or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer” after “the following criteria”,

xi. in section 4.3.1.6. by striking out “Intersections with Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure roads shall be to Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure standards” and substituting “Intersections with Ministry of Transportation and Transit roads shall be to Ministry of Transportation and Transit standards”,

xii. by repealing Table 4-1 Road Classifications – Road Classification and Design Table,

xiii. by repealing Figure 4-1 City of Langford – Local Roads,

xiv. in section 4.7.1. by striking out “Table 4-1 and the reference drawings that accompany this schedule”,

xv. in section 4.7.1. by adding “the current adopted Transportation Master Plan, Active Transportation Plan, the drawing “Typical Road X-Section” and other reference drawings as attached to and forming part of this bylaw, all other applicable requirements or agreements related to the development, or as otherwise approved or directed in writing by the City Engineer through referral comments or otherwise” after “in accordance with”,

xvi. by adding a new section 4.7.2. after section 4.7.1. to read: “The following are the minimum required public road right-of-way widths for each road classification as per Figure 16: Future Road Classifications in the Transportation Master Plan, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer:

(a) All Local Road rights-of-way shall be a minimum of 20.0 metres wide.

(b) All Collector and Arterial Road rights-of-way shall be a minimum of 25.0 metres wide.

(c) All Highway Road rights-of-way shall be a minimum of 30.0 metres wide, or as otherwise approved or required by the Ministry of Transportation and Transit.”,

xvii. by adding a new section 4.7.3. after section 4.7.2. to read: “The following are the standard minimum widths for road Cross Section features, in accordance with the current adopted Transportation Master Plan and Active Transportation Plan, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer:

(a) All vehicular travel lanes shall be a minimum of 3.3 metres wide.

(b) All shared local travel lanes (with sharrows and yield flow on street parking) shall be a minimum of 4.25 metres wide.

(c) All vehicular parking lanes and scalloped parking bays shall be a minimum of 2.4 metres wide.

(d) All bike lanes shall be a minimum of 1.5 metres wide on Local Roads and 1.8 metres on Collector Roads or higher classifications.

(e) All on street bike lane buffers with or without barriers shall be a minimum of 0.6 metres wide.

(f) All raised or separated bike lanes that are at the same elevation and directly adjacent to a sidewalk shall have a 0.2 metre buffer between the sidewalk and bike lane.

(g) All multi-use paths shall be a minimum of 3.0 metres wide.

(h) All concrete sidewalks shall be a minimum of 1.8 metres wide.

(i) All red brick sidewalks shall be a minimum of 2.2 metres wide.

(j) Any hard surface for public passage that contains obstructions, such as utility poles or bollards, shall have a minimum 1.2 metre wide passable continuation of the hard surfaced area around the obstruction for accessibility reasons.

(k) All separated boulevards shall include irrigation and shall be a minimum of 1.2 metres wide for shrubbery and 2.0 metres wide for street trees and all require the approval of the Director of Parks.

(l) All loading zones and transit bays shall be designed to be as wide and as long as is necessary to accommodate the largest anticipated vehicle permitted.

(m) All loading zones and transit bays shall be fully outside of any vehicular travel lanes or on street bike lanes on Collector Roads or higher classification.”,

xviii. in section 4.13.1. by striking out “, attached” and substituting “or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer”,

xix. in section 4.15.1.3. by striking out “b) 50% of the lot frontage if the frontage exceeds 12.0m to a maximum of 8.0m or” and substituting “Repealed”,

xx. in section 4.15.1.7. by striking out “A Bylaw 33 permit for driveway construction from the curb to the property line shall accompany all building permits, and is required for modification to existing driveways and addition of new driveways within the road right of way” and substituting “A Street Construction Permit under Streets and Traffic Bylaw No. 2233, 2025 is required for the modification of existing driveways and the addition of new driveways within the road right of way”,

xxi. in section 4.21.1. by striking out “Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure” and substituting “Ministry of Transportation and Transit”,

xxii. in section 4.21.2.2. by striking out “Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure” and substituting “Ministry of Transportation and Transit”,

xxiii. by repealing Table 4-3 – Road and Street Lighting Standards for Bear Mountain,

xxiv. by repealing Drawing No. BM1 through BM11 inclusive,

xxv. by repealing Drawing No. R1 through R19 inclusive,

xxvi. by adding a new drawing titled “Typical Road X-Section” as attached to and forming part of this bylaw, after Drawing No. R20,

j) In Schedule 5:

i. in section 5.1.1. by striking out “SD-1 illustrates the major water courses within the City of Langford. Existing major storm water control and/or treatment areas are shown. These areas are to be preserved unless professional storm water management studies indicate otherwise. The areas of the municipality where storm water infiltration and storm water detention (storage) are required for development are also shown on SD-1.

The City Engineer may allow or require the use of storm water infiltration works in areas designated on SD-1 for storm water detention, if the City Engineer is of the opinion that soil conditions on the site in question are suitable for storm water infiltration, and may allow or require the use of storm water detention works in areas designated on SD-1 for storm water infiltration if the City Engineer is of the opinion that the soil conditions on the site in question are not suitable for storm water infiltration. The City Engineer’s opinion shall be based on the contents of a storm water management plan for the site prepared by the Engineer or Geoscientist of Record. (Bylaw 1513)” and substituting “SD-1 illustrates the major water courses within the City of Langford. Existing major storm water control and/or treatment areas are shown. These areas are to be preserved unless professional storm water management studies approved by the City Engineer indicate otherwise. The areas of the municipality where storm water infiltration and storm water detention (storage) are required for development are also shown on SD-1.”

ii. in section 5.1.5. by striking out “Where parkland in excess of 0.25 ha has been dedicated to the City in conjunction with the proposed subdivision or development, storm water detention and treatment facilities may be located within the park, if in the opinion of the City Engineer the treatment and detention area will not detract from the aesthetics of the park and will not affect environmentally sensitive areas within the park and the usefulness to and safety of the public.” and substituting “Repealed.”

iii. in section 5.1.7. by striking out “A storm water management plan prepared by a Professional Engineer is required which will show: (Bylaw No. 1669)

5.1.7.1 Scaled topographic site plan with existing cadastral and proposed development layout.

5.1.7.2 Drainage catchment areas showing contributory area to the site, onsite subcatchments, cumulative catchments and points of discharge.

5.1.7.3 Predevelopment and post development flows.

5.1.7.4 Internal drainage structures for conveyance, control and treatment.

5.1.7.5 Existing and proposed offsite works.

5.1.7.6 Erosion and sediment control works.”

and substituting “For all subdivisions and developments in the City of Langford, a stormwater management plan (SWMP) prepared by a Qualified Professional is required to be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to subdivision, foundation or building permit whichever is first. The SWMP should provide details on the proposed stormwater management systems and the assessment on the downstream drainage system. The submission must include:

5.1.7.1 General description of the proposed development.

5.1.7.2 Existing and proposed drainage catchment areas.

5.1.7.3 Method and parameters used for hydrological and hydraulic analysis. Percolation tests are to be performed in the winter months.

5.1.7.4 Peak predevelopment and post development flows for the 2-year and 10-year storm events.

5.1.7.5 Description and sizing of stormwater best management practice (BMP) features.

5.1.7.6 Locations, sizes, design flows / volumes and capacities of all proposed works.

5.1.7.7 Capacity assessment of infrastructure downstream of the development to the point of discharge to a natural watercourse for the 10-year (up to 900 mm in diameter) or 25-year (greater than 900 mm in diameter) return period events. This assessment shall consider the Community Plan and other available land-use information for the entire catchment area.

5.1.7.8 Erosion and sediment control works required during construction.”

iv. in section 5.2.1 by striking out “Map 16,”,

v. by adding a new section 5.2.2. after section 5.2.1. to read: “Placement of fill is not permitted within a floodplain unless there is no net loss in the available flood storage volume up to the 200-year flood level.”,

vi. in section 5.3.1 by striking out “All minor systems, those designed and installed as part of the works and services for the subdivision or development, shall be designed for a 10 year peak flow rate. The site must allow for 200mm of ponding onsite to be directed to an overflow route either piped or overland.” and substituting “Minor systems consisting of storm drains, gutters, catch basins, driveways and local road culverts and local roadside ditches, shall be designed to convey (without surcharge) flows up to the 10-year return period for pipes up to 900 mm in diameter and up to the 25-year return period for pipes larger than 900 mm in diameter.”,

vii. by adding a new section 5.3.2.1. after section 5.3.2. to read: “Major systems consisting of surface flood paths, roadways, trunk storm drains and culvert crossings under collector roads, arterial roads and provincial highways, watercourses, and bypass structures for onsite and offsite stormwater management, shall be designed up to the 200-year return period. Where the applicant demonstrates, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, that overland conveyance is not practicable, such flows may be conveyed by a piped system subject to the approval of the City Engineer.”,

viii. by adding a new section 5.4.1.1 after section 5.4.1. to read: “Stormwater management model (SWMM) based models shall be used for the hydrograph method, unless approved otherwise by the City Engineer. The SWMM model shall consider winter baseflows and antecedent groundwater and soil conditions. Land data shall be based on currently available post-develop land-use conditions as per the Community Plan.”,

ix. in section 5.4.3. by striking out “Rainfall intensity shall be taken from the intensity-duration-frequency (IDF) curves provided in SD-3. The minimum initial time of concentration shall be 10 minutes. For catchments which will remain undeveloped, the time of concentration shall be calculated using good engineering judgement.” and substituting “Rainfall intensity shall be taken from the intensity-duration-frequency (IDF) curves provided in SD-3. Climate change shall be considered and incorporated into the design in accordance with EGBC guidelines. The minimum initial time of concentration shall be 10 minutes. For catchments which will remain undeveloped, the time of concentration shall be calculated using good engineering judgement.”,

x. in section 5.5.1 by striking out:

Roughness coefficients
Concrete 0.013, PVC 0.013
Minimum diameter
300 mm
Minimum velocity
0.61 m/sec (flowing full or half full)
Maximum velocity
6.1 m/sec
Above this maximum velocity, special consideration must be
given by the Professional Engineer to incorporate pipe materials
and construction methods, including pipe anchorage, scour
protection and energy dissipation to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer.
The choice of pipe material shall be in accordance with the
current edition of MMCD. No corrugated metal pipe (CMP) or
corrugated steel pipe (CSP) is permitted. (Bylaw Nos. 1669,
1817)

and substituting:

“The minimum pipe diameter shall be as follows:

xi. by adding a new section 5.5.1.1 to read: “The Manning’s formula shall be used to determine the conveyance capacity. The roughness coefficient ‘n’ shall be a minimum of 0.013 for all smooth pipes and 0.024 for corrugated pipes.”,

xii. by adding a new section 5.5.1.2 to read: “The minimum design velocity for pipes flowing full or half full is 0.6 m/s.”,

xiii. by adding a new section 5.5.1.3 to read: “The choice of pipe material shall be in accordance with the current edition of MMCD. No corrugated metal pipe (CMP) or corrugated steel pipe (CSP) is permitted.”,

xiv. by adding a new section 5.5.1.4 to read: Minimum grade shall be 0.25% for pipes less than 525 mm in diameter and 0.1% for pipes equal or greater than 525 mm in diameter.”,

xv. by adding a new section 5.5.1.5 to read: “Pipes with grades greater than 10% shall have trench dams as per detail SD-18.”,

xvi. by adding a new section 5.5.1.6 to read: “The system shall convey the design flow without surcharge”,

xvii. by adding a new section 5.6.2.1 to read: “Inside drop structures are not permitted.”,

xviii. in section 5.6.4 by striking out “Outside drop manholes will be permitted, if in the opinion of the City Engineer, the circumstances preclude the use of normal manholes. These shall be constructed wherever the change in invert elevations though the manhole are greater than 600mm. Elevations changes greater than 600mm shall be by way of an outside drop only. Allowance shall be made in the design for the effect of the resulting turbulence on the hydraulic capacity of the system.” and substituting “Outside drop manholes should be avoided where possible by steepening inlet drains. Where necessary provide an outside structure as follows:

xix. in section 5.6.7 by striking out “The City Engineer may approve situations involving a large pipe flowing into a smaller pipe at steeper grade.” and substituting “Downstream pipe sizes are not to be reduced unless the downstream pipe is 600 mm diameter or larger and increased grade provides adequate capacity. The reduced downstream pipe sizes are to be specifically approved by the City Engineer. The maximum reduction is two pipe sizes.”,

xx. in section 5.6.15 by striking out “Lanford Storm” and substituting “Langford Storm”,

xxi. by adding a new section 5.7.1.1 to read: “Unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer, connections are to serve the perimeter (foundation) drains of all buildings by gravity.”,

xxii. by adding a new section 5.7.2.1 to read: “Manholes are required on service connections larger than 200 mm in diameter, unless the connection is more than two pipe sizes smaller than the main to which it is joining. A service connection exceeding 30 m in length shall be treated as a regular main.”,

xxiii. by adding a new section 5.7.2.2 to read: “Unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer, service connections shall be located at the lowest corner of the property.”,

xxiv. by adding a new section 5.7.8 to read: “For connections into existing mains, coring in conjunctions with the use of an Inserta-Tee is required. Hammer taps and mortared joints are not permitted.”,

xxv. by adding a new section 5.7.9 to read: “Inserta-Tees are only permitted for connections to an existing system. Manufactured wyes must be used on all new storm drain systems.”,

xxvi. by adding a new section 5.7.10 to read: “Flexseal shear band coupler (or approved equivalent by the City Engineer) and concrete encasement must be used on wyes on existing mains.”,

xxvii. by adding a new section 5.7.11 to read: “All connections to existing mains that required the installation of a manufactured wye requires video inspection of the main.”,

xxviii. in section 5.8.1 by striking out “All inspection chamber (IC) lids and collars shall be installed in accordance with drawing SS S9. The lid cams shall be securely tightened to ensure that they are not subject to vandalism or misuse. (Bylaw No. 1494)” and substituting “All inspection chamber (IC) shall be installed in accordance with drawing SS S9.”,

xxix. in section 5.8.2 by striking out “All inspection chambers shall have a cast iron chamber cover and concrete surround in accordance with drawing SS S9.” and substituting “All inspection chambers shall have a cast iron chamber cover and concrete surround. The clearance between the cast iron lid and the plastic lid shall be a minimum of 75 mm.”,

xxx. by adding a new section 5.8.2.1 to read: “The lid caps shall be securely tightened to ensure that they are not subject to vandalism or misuse.”,

xxxi. in section 5.8.3 by striking out “Any inspection chamber set in a slope greater than 3% shall have a cast iron chamber cover and concrete surround in accordance with SS S9.” and substituting “Repealed.”,

xxxii. in section 5.8.4 by striking out “Wherever a inspection chamber is covered by a cast iron chamber cover, the clearance between the cast iron lid and the plastic lid shall be a minimum of 75mm.” and substituting “Repealed.”,

xxxiii. by adding a new section 5.9.2.1 to read: “CCTV video inspection of the existing pipe is required for an Inserta-Tee connection made to existing pipe. Compaction testing results and the CCTV video are to be provided to the City Engineer for review and acceptance prior to paving.”,

xxxiv. in section 5.10.1 by striking out “Catch basins are detailed as per drawing SS S11 shall be provided as required to collect from a maximum area of 400 square metres of road, at the beginning of curb returns to which water flows and at low points. Leads will be a minimum 150 mm diameter. Rim elevations shall be 25 mm below finished pavement grade. (Bylaw No. 1817)” and substituting “Catch basins are detailed as per drawing SS S11.”,

xxxv. in section 5.10.2 by striking out “The catch basin grate must be a ¾ grate. (Bylaw No. 1817)” and substituting “The catch basin grate must be a ¾ grate for catch basins located along a curb.”,

xxxvi. by adding a new section 5.10.3 to read: “Catch basins are required at regular intervals along roadways, at intersections and at low points.”,

xxxvii. by adding a new section 5.10.4 to read: “Catch basin spacing is to provide sufficient inlet capacity to collect the entire minor flow or major flow, if required into the pipe system. Space catch basins to drain a maximum paved area of 400 m2.”,

xxxviii. by adding a new section 5.10.5 to read: “Other spacing requirements include:

(a) Prevent overflow to driveways, boulevards, sidewalks and private property;

(b) Catch basins are to be upgradient of crosswalks;

(c) Avoid low points in curb returns at intersections; and

(d) Catch basin leads to discharge into manholes where possible.”,

xxxix. by adding a new section 5.10.6 to read: “Double catch basins shall be used at low points and on steep grades for roads with roll-over curbs. The design professional must ensure that there is sufficient inlet capacity for design runoff to enter the underground pipe system.”,

xl. by adding a new section 5.10.7 to read: “Generally, 600 mm diameter reinforced concrete catch basins shall be used for roadway drainage except when installation is restricted by depth. Special offset catch basins shall only be used where approved by the City Engineer.”,

xli. by adding a new section 5.10.8 to read: “Lawn basins are required on boulevards and private properties where necessary to prevent ponding or flooding of sidewalks, boulevards, driveways, buildings and yards.”,

xlii. by adding a new section 5.10.9 to read: “Domed cast iron beehive grates are to be used for inlets on grass surfaces.”,

xliii. by adding a new section 5.10.10 to read: “Maximum length of catch basin leads shall be 30.0 metres.”,

xliv. by adding a new section 5.10.11 to read: “Minimum grade of catch basin leads shall be 1.0 %.”,

xlv. by adding a new section 5.10.12 to read: “Double catch basins shall be not connected directly together but rather each have individual leads.”,

xlvi. in section 5.11.2 by striking out “Sandbag inlet headwalls are permitted for repairs to existing sandbag headwalls only. (Bylaw No. 1669)”,

xlvii. by adding a new section 5.11.3 to read: “Mortared rock headwalls are to be constructed as per detail SD-17. Headwalls for pipes larger than 600 mm in diameter are to be designed by a Professional Engineer.”

xlviii. by adding a new section 5.11.4 to read: “Ditch inlets to storm strains should include grillage for pipes larger than 600 mm diameter, debris screens and sedimentation basins.”,

xlix. by adding a new section 5.12.3 to read: “Mortared rock headwalls are to be constructed as per detail SD-17. Headwalls for pipes larger than 600 mm in diameter are to be designed by a Professional Engineer.”,

l. in section 5.13.5.2 by striking out “SD 15 shows a combined detention and oil/grit separator” and substituting “Repealed”,

li. in section 5.14.6 by striking out “Where ever possible,”

lii. by adding a new section 5.15. to read: “Erosion, Sediment and Dust Control (ESDC)”,

liii. by adding a new section 5.15.1 to read: “All developments shall submit details of the erosion, sediment and dust control measures to be implemented on site to the City Engineer for review and acceptance prior to any land alteration. Such measures shall be provided in the form of an ESDC plan, which may be incorporated into the Mitigation Plan as per section 2.5 of Schedule 2 of this bylaw, or may be incorporated into the stormwater management plan submission as per section 5.1.7. of Schedule 5 of this bylaw. ESDC plans shall take into consideration the Engineers and Geoscientists British Columbia Joint Professional Practice Guideline – Erosion and Sediment Control.”,

liv. by adding a new section 5.15.2 to read: “Erosion and Sediment Control Plans shall include but are not limited to the following key components:

(a) Project Phasing;

(b) ESDC measures, practices and facilities (applicable to each phase or catchment area);

(c) ESDC specifications including locations, relevant product information, installation criteria and applicable maintenance criteria;

(d) ESDC monitoring requirements;

(e) ESDC team member and contact information;

(f) Applicable timing restrictions including wet-weather operating restrictions; and

(g) Reference to relevant regulatory criteria.”,

k) In Schedule 9:

i. in section 9.2. by striking out “except in areas identified in the Street Atlas as Cross Section R17”,

l) In Schedule 10, by striking out all of Schedule 10 and substituting “Schedule 10 Irrigation Standards” as attached to and forming part of this bylaw.

m) In Schedule 11:

i. in the table titled “City of Langford Supplementary Specifications”, by striking out that table and substituting with “City of Langford Supplementary Specifications” as attached to and forming part of this bylaw,

ii. in the table titled “Supplementary Specifications Modifications and Additions to the MMCD Specifications”, by striking out that table and substituting “Supplementary Specifications Modifications and Additions to the MMCD Specifications” as attached to and forming part of this bylaw,

iii. by striking out that drawing corresponding with MMCD SS P5 and substituting with MMCD SS P5 as attached to and forming part of this bylaw,

iv. by adding MMCD SS P7(a) as attached to and forming part of this bylaw after the drawing No. P7,

v. by striking out that drawing corresponding with MMCD SS P11 and substituting with MMCD SS P11 as attached to and forming part of this bylaw,

vi. by striking out that drawing corresponding with MMCD SS P12 and substituting with MMCD SS P12 as attached to and forming part of this bylaw,

vii. by striking out that drawing corresponding with MMCD SS L1(a) and substituting with MMCD L1(a) as attached to and forming part of this bylaw,

viii. by striking out that drawing corresponding with MMCD SS L2(a) and substituting with MMCD SS L2(a) as attached to and forming part of this bylaw,

ix. by striking out that drawing corresponding with MMCD SS L2(b) and substituting with MMCD SS L2(b) as attached to and forming part of this bylaw,

x. by striking out that drawing corresponding with MMCD SS L2(c) and substituting with MMCD SS L2(c) as attached to and forming part of this bylaw,

xi. by striking out that drawing corresponding with MMCD SS L2(d) and substituting with MMCD SS L2(d) as attached to and forming part of this bylaw,

xii. by striking out that drawing corresponding with MMCD SS L2(fa),

xiii. by striking out that drawing corresponding with MMCD SS L2(fb),

xiv. by striking out that drawing corresponding with MMCD SS L2(g),

xv. by striking out that drawing corresponding with MMCD SS L2(h),

xvi. by inserting MMCD SS L3(a) as attached to and forming part of this bylaw,

xvii. by inserting MMCD SS L3(b) as attached to and forming part of this bylaw,

xviii. by inserting MMCD SS L3(c) as attached to and forming part of this bylaw,

xix. by inserting MMCD SS L3(d) as attached to and forming part of this bylaw,

xx. by inserting MMCD SS L3(e) as attached to and forming part of this bylaw,

xxi. by striking out that drawing corresponding with MMCD SS L4(a) and substituting with MMCD SS L4(a) as attached to and forming part of this bylaw,

xxii. by striking out that drawing corresponding with MMCD SS L4,

xxiii. by striking out that drawing corresponding with SD-7 and substituting with SD-7 as attached to and forming part of this bylaw,

xxiv. by inserting SD-17 as attached to and forming part of this bylaw,

xxv. by inserting SD-18 as attached to and forming part of this bylaw.

n) In Schedule 14:

i. in section 14.2.4.1.1. by striking out “If in the assessment of the Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities, the density of one tree per 12 lineal meters of frontage cannot be accomplished without compromising sound arboricultural practices, due to the size or other characteristics of the frontage, the developer shall pay cash-in-lieu to the City in the amount of $1750.00 for each required boulevard tree that cannot be accommodated, to be used by the City to provide boulevard trees in other locations” and substituting “Despite section 14.2.4.1., if determined by the Director of Parks that the density of one (1) tree per 12 lineal metres of frontage cannot be accomplished for any reason, the developer shall pay cash-in-lieu to the City in the amount of $1750.00 for each required boulevard tree that cannot be accommodated.”,

ii. in section 14.2.4.3. by striking out “Coniferous trees are to be a minimum height of 3.0 m from ground level or as approved by the Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities. For coniferous trees that are tall and columnar, the rootball is to be a minimum of 700 mm (27.5”), for tall and broad, the rootball is to be a minimum of 850 mm (33.5”)” and substituting “Coniferous trees are not to be located within boulevards.”,

iii. in section 14.2.4.5. by striking out “For recommended boulevard tree species, refer to Approved Product List. (Bylaw 1817)” and substituting “For boulevard tree plantings, refer to Approved Species List”,

iv. by adding a new section 14.2.4.10. after section 14.2.4.9. to read: “When root barrier is required, it must adhere to the minimum thickness. Root barriers must reach a minimum depth of 4500 mm.”,

v. in section 14.2.6.1. by striking out “Existing or significant trees on existing or future boulevards, shall be evaluated prior to site work commencing, and shall be retained at the discretion of the Parks Manager” and substituting “Existing or significant trees on existing or planned future boulevards shall be evaluated for retention purposes prior to site work commencing. At the discretion of the Director of Parks, an arborist report and tree survey may be required prior to landscape approvals”,

vi. in section 14.2.6.2. by striking out “An arborist report or tree survey may be required as part of the landscape plan, at the discretion of the Parks Manager. Existing trees to be retained must be protected with a tree protection barrier, prior to commencement of any site works. Tree Protection barrier as per Schedule 11, detail L4 or as per directed by a Certified Arborist and approve by the Director of Parks, Recreation and Facilities, is to be installed and maintained for the duration of the development” and substituting “All trees to be retained must be protected with tree protection barrier prior to the commencement of any site works. Tree protection barriers must be constructed in accordance with Schedule B of City of Langford Tree Protection Bylaw No. 2269, 2026, and must be installed and maintained for the duration of the development”,

vii. in section 14.3. by striking out “Landscaping (Bylaw No. 1817)” and substituting “Landscaping Issuance Requirements”,

viii. in section 14.3.1.6. by striking out “All new turf grass seeding is fully germinated/ well established and has been mowed to 200 mm height three times. (Bylaw 1817)” and substituting “All new turf grass seeding and sod must be fully germinated or knitted prior to CA-L issuance”,

ix. in section 14.3.1.7. by striking out “All new turf grass sod is fully knit/ well established and has been mowed to 200mm height twice. (Bylaw 1817)” and substituting “Repealed”,

x. in section 14.4.1.1. by striking out “Conduct regular maintenance of off-site landscaping” and substituting “Conduct regular maintenance of off-site landscaping which includes but is not limited to tree well weeding, lawn mowing, irrigation charging and winterization, mulching, tree pruning”,

xi. by adding a new section 14.5.5. after section 14.5.4. to read: “FA-L shall not be issued between November 1st and April 1st when there are boulevard trees and/or irrigation systems. The City requires proof of leaf out and operating irrigation systems prior to FA-L issuance.”,

xii. by adding a new section 14.6. after section 14.5.5. to read:

“14.6. RELATED WORK

o) In Appendix A by striking out Appendix A and substituting a new Appendix A as attached to and forming part of this bylaw.

2. This Bylaw may be cited for all purposes as “Subdivision and Development Servicing Bylaw No. 1000, Amendment No. 28, Bylaw No. 2158, 2026".

READ A FIRST TIME this ___ day of ____, ___.

READ A SECOND TIME this ___ day of ____, ___.

READ A THIRD TIME this ___ day of ____, ___.

ADOPTED this ___ day of ____, ___.

_________________________　　　　　　　　　　　　　　_________________________

PRESIDING COUNCIL MEMBER　　　　　　　　　　　　　　CORPORATE OFFICER