This site is in beta — data may be incomplete and features are still being added.

MattersDevelopmentBylaw No. 1961First seen Mar 15, 2021Last discussed Jun 21, 2021

McCallum and City Gate zoning changes

The proposed zoning change would add business park and industrial uses to the mixed-use employment zone at 780 and 830 McCallum Road and 2371 City Gate Boulevard. This would allow a broader range of employment uses on those properties.

Where it stands: Bylaw adoption was listed Jun 21, 2021; the record does not confirm adoption.

Governing bylawNo. 300In force

Zoning Bylaw

The bylaw sets the rules for how land and water areas in Langford may be used or subdivided, where buildings and structures may be placed, and how parking, loading, screening and landscaping are handled. It is organised into parts covering definitions, general compliance and regulations, parking and bicycle rules, how zones are established, and rules for individual zones; schedules include the zoning map and additional area-specific regulations.

Location

Loading map…

1 mapped location across 1 matter

Browse mapped locations without the map

Timeline

Every time this matter appeared in council records, newest first.

  1. June 21, 2021· Council

    Adoption of the zoning amendment listed

    Final approval. The bylaw is now in force.

  2. March 15, 2021· Council

    Business park and industrial uses proposed in the employment zone

    Council approved the content and final wording. Adoption is the last step.

  3. March 15, 2021· Council

    Public hearing held on zoning changes for three properties

    Public hearing for a proposed zoning amendment impacting properties at 780 & 830 McCallum Rd and 2371 City Gate Boulevard.

    Who spoke

    • A residentOpposes · Zoning changes and development planning
      Opposes expanding permitted uses without a community plan and seeks clarity about potential development and its effects on nearby homes.
    • A residentOpposes · Green space, industrial development, and traffic
      Urges retaining green space instead of adding industry, warning that additional industrial uses would worsen traffic bottlenecks.
    • A residentOpposes · Planned recreational and green space
      Urges retaining the planned green space amid repeated changes to the development proposal.
    • A residentConcerned · Industrial zoning, green space, and traffic
      Objects to further industrial zoning, citing lost green space and unresolved traffic congestion.
    • A residentOpposes · Proposed industrial zoning and preferred land use
      Opposes the proposed industrial uses and prefers returning to mixed-use or residential zoning.
    • A residentOpposes · Rezoning impacts and residential land use
      Opposes the rezoning, citing increased traffic, noise, and light, and favors returning to residential zoning.