MattersDevelopmentZ21-0040First seen Jan 10, 2022Last discussed Jun 17, 2024
2772 Vantilburg Crescent rezoning
AdoptedThe rezoning allows about 20 townhomes in eight blocks at 2772 Vantilburg Crescent. A related housing agreement requires two units to rent at least 10% below market rates for at least 10 years.
Where it stands: Housing agreement bylaw adopted Jun 17, 2024.
Governing bylawNo. 2012
Langford Zoning Bylaw, Amendment No. 645, (2772 Vantilburg Crescent)The specified shaded portions of 2772 Vantilburg Crescent are changed from the One- and Two-Family Residential (R2) Zone to the City Centre 2 (CC2) Zone. The bylaw also sets amenity contributions for each residential unit on the property and states that these contributions are not eligible for reduction under Section 2 of Schedule AD.
Location
1 mapped location across 1 matter
Browse mapped locations without the map
Timeline
Every time this matter appeared in council records, newest first.
Three readings for two below-market rental units
Gave First, Second and Third Readings to a housing agreement bylaw for 2772 Vantilburg Crescent.
Proposed layout Decision: Gave all three readings to the housing agreement bylaw for 2772 Vantilburg Crescent.
Passed 7–0
Second and third readings carried with covenants and traffic calming
Council considered giving Bylaw No. 2012 second and third readings (rezoning 2772 Vantilburg Crescent).
Decision: Gave second and third readings to 2772 Vantilburg Crescent bylaw with covenants and traffic calming.
Adopted 6–1· Against: Mark Morley
Decision: Rejected bringing the 2772 Vantilburg Crescent bylaw back for 2nd and 3rd readings.
Defeated
- Christy Faulkner (Penelope Place)Opposes · Van Tilburg Crescent townhouses
Opposes the development at this location, citing its scale, traffic concerns, and the neighborhood’s existing character. - Jennifer Ridley (Penelope Place)Concerned · Van Tilburg Crescent townhouses
Urges council to consider the effects of construction and development on neighborhood greenery, quiet, and children’s safety. - James Kilpatrick (Van Tilburg Crescent)Opposes · Van Tilburg Crescent townhouses
Opposes the development’s scale, citing traffic, drainage, tree stability, construction risks, and pressure to accept development for sewer service. - Shazia Kudra (Nicholas Drive)Supports · Van Tilburg Crescent townhouses
Supports the development for its transit access, green features, rental-friendly design, and potential to reduce car ownership. - Hamina (Isabel Avenue)Supports · Van Tilburg Crescent townhouses
Supports the townhouses as a more affordable housing option for a newly married couple hoping to start a family. - Wayne Wickett (Penelope Place)Mixed · Van Tilburg Crescent townhouses
Supports safer traffic measures and sewer service but questions the project’s scale and urges council to consider combined development impacts. - Jordan Van Tiel (Bear Mountain Parkway)Supports · Van Tilburg Crescent townhouses
Supports the development as an opportunity for working professionals and future families to afford a home near schools and amenities. - Mickey Fleming (Van Tilburg Crescent)Supports · Van Tilburg Crescent townhouses
Supports the low-density townhouses as thoughtfully designed, more affordable homes for young families in a walkable central area. - Impreet McCrae (Strandlin Avenue)Supports · Townhouse development
Describes a positive experience with a related development and praises its design, construction quality, and developer responsiveness. - Ferris Kathrata (Jacqueline Road)Supports · Van Tilburg Crescent townhouses
Supports the project as a well-designed, more attainable home option for families, with sewer service and access to a walkable community. - Sarah Gallamli (Happy Valley Road)Supports · Van Tilburg Crescent townhouses
Urges approval, citing the need for attainable housing, energy-efficient homes, local jobs, and opportunities for young families to settle in Langford. - Cole Boudreau (Bear Mountain Parkway)Supports · Van Tilburg Crescent townhouses
Supports the development as a chance for a young couple to afford a home with space for a future family and their belongings. - Sam Baines (Sandstone Lane)Supports · Van Tilburg Crescent townhouses
Supports the project as an opportunity for a young family to own a home and become part of the community. - Amber Thompson (Hoy Lake Avenue)Opposes · Van Tilburg Crescent townhouses
Opposes the development, citing school traffic, tandem garage concerns, and uncertainty about whether the townhouses would be affordable. - Kram Sandu (Wheeling Drive)Supports · Van Tilburg Crescent townhouses
Supports the development as a way to provide housing for younger residents and help sustain Langford’s workforce and local economy. - Ariba Ghalib (Aggregate Court)Supports · Van Tilburg Crescent townhouses
Supports the project as a suitable, more affordable home for a growing family near Savory Elementary. - Sean Newby (Keldor Caldera Court)Supports · Van Tilburg Crescent townhouses
Supports the development as a way to provide homeownership opportunities for new families while recognizing the value of neighborhood character. - Andrew Haas (Van Tilburg Crescent)Concerned · Van Tilburg Crescent townhouses
Argues the proposal would erode the neighborhood’s safe, walkable character and calls for growth that preserves what residents value.
- Christy Faulkner (Penelope Place)Opposes · Van Tilburg Crescent townhouses
Staff review proposed 20 townhomes and recommend neighbourhood consultation
Consideration of a rezoning application to permit 20 townhouse units at 2772 Vantilburg Crescent.